Possible Paths for GDP Per Capita – Simulation with a Demographic Growth Model

20 December 2017DOI: https://doi.org/10.25201/FER.16.4.3657

Author information:

Éva Berde: Corvinus University of Budapest, Professor. E-mail:

Izabella Kuncz: Corvinus University of Budapest, Assistant Lecturer. E-mail:

Abstract:

To begin our paper, we point out the importance of demographic growth models by highlighting the conceptual framework of overlapping generations. We define the formulas in our own model based on Lee – Mason (2010), modifying the original framework in several respects. We present the exogenous fertility and survival rates in different demographic scenarios, and then we derive the simulation paths for GDP per capita from these. A word of caution regarding our results: the simple structure of our model disregards several factors potentially influencing growth. When concentrating solely on the impact of changes in fertility and mortality rates, our simulation results suggest that a drop in the total fertility rate, even to slightly below the replacement level, and even in the context of a relatively high survival rate, may increase GDP per capita. However, in the case of an extremely low total fertility rate and a high survival rate, an economic downturn can be expected.

Cite as (APA):

Berde, É., & Kuncz, I. (2017). Possible Paths for GDP Per Capita – Simulation with a Demographic Growth Model. Financial and Economic Review, 16(4), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.25201/FER.16.4.3657

PDF download
The works on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Column:

Study

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:

E23, J11, O40

Keywords:

overlapping generations model, total fertility rate, survival rate, simulation path, GDP per capita

References:

Adelman, I. (1963): An Econometric Analysis of Population Growth. The American Economic Review, 53(3): 314–339.

Auerbach, A.J. – Kotlikoff, L.J. (1987): Dynamic fiscal policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barro, R.J. – Becker, G.S. (1989): Fertility Choice in a Model of Economic Growth. Econometrica, 57(2): 481–501. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912563

Becker, G.S. (1960): An Economic Analysis of Fertility. In: National Bureau of Economic Research, (Ed): Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, pp. 209–240.

Becker, G.S. – Lewis, H.G. (1973): On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2): S279–S288. https://doi.org/10.1086/260166

Becker, G.S. – Murphy, K.M.– Tamura, R. (1990): Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): S12–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/261723

Black, S.E. – Devereux, P.J. – Salvanes, K.G. (2005): The More the Merrier? The Effect of Family Size and Birth Order on Children’s Education. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2): 669–700. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/120.2.669

Bloom, D. – Canning, D. – Sevilla, J. (2003): The demographic dividend: A new perspective on the economic consequences of population change. Rand Corporation.

Cipriani, G.P. (2014): Population aging and PAYG pensions in the OLG model. Journal of Population Economics, 27(1): 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-013-0465-9

Colleran, H. – Jasienska, G. – Nenko, I. – Galbarczyk, A. – Mace, R. (2015): Fertility decline and the changing dynamics of wealth, status and inequality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1806).

Dang, H.-A.H. – Rogers, F.H. (2016): The Decision to Invest in Child Quality over Quantity: Household Size and Household Investment in Education in Vietnam. The World Bank Economic Review, 30(1): 104–142.

Diamond, P.A. (1965): National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model. The American Economic Review, 55(5): 1126–1150.

Easterlin, R.J. (1973): Does Money Buy Happiness? The Public Interest, 30: 3–10.

Ellis, J. (2008): Culture, fertility, and son preference. PhD thesis. The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).

Freedman, D.S. (1963): The Relation of Economic Status to Fertility. The American Economic Review, 53(3): 414–426.

Freedman, R. – Coombs, L. (1966a): Childspacing and Family Economic Position. American Sociological Review, 31(5): 631–648. https://doi.org/10.2307/2091855

Freedman, R. – Coombs, L. (1966b): Economic Considerations in Family Growth Decisions. Population Studies, 20(2): 197–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/2172982

Frejka, T. (2016): The demographic transition revisited: a cohort perspective. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, working paper WP–2016–012.

Gál, R.I. – Vanhuysse, P. – Vargha, L. (2016): Pro-elderly welfare states within pro-child societies: Incorporating family cash and time into intergenerational transfers analysis. Center for Economic Institutions, Working Paper No 2016–6.

Galor, O. – Weil, D.N. (1999): From Malthusian Stagnation to Modern Growth. The American Economic Review, 89(2): 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.2.150

Guo, R. – Yi, J. – Zhang, J. (2017): Family Size, Birth Order, and Tests of the Quantity–Quality Model. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(2): 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.09.006

Kalemli-Ozcan, S. – Ryder, H.E. – Weil, D.N. (2000): Mortality decline, human capital investment, and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 62(1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00073-0

Kaplan, H. (1994): Evolutionary and Wealth Flows Theories of Fertility: Empirical Tests and New Models. Population and Development Review, 20(4): 753–791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137661

Lawson, D.W. – Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2016): The Offspring Quantity–Quality Trade-off and Human Fertility Variation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1692).

Lee, R. – Mason, A. (2010): Fertility, Human Capital and Economic Growth over the Demographic Transition. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie, 26(2): 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9186-x

Luci, A. – Thevenon, O. (2010): Does economic development drive the fertility rebound in OECD countries? Working paper No. hal-00520948, HAL.

Malthus, T. (1798): An Essay on the Principle of Population, as it Affects the Future Improvement of Society with Remarks on the Speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and Other Writers. J. Johnson in St. Paul’s church-yard. London.

Mankiw, N.G. – Romer, D. – Weil, D.N. (1992): A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2): 407–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118477

Mason, A. (2005): Demographic transition and demographic dividends in developed and developing countries. In United Nations expert group meeting on social and economic implications of changing population age structures, vol. 31. Mexico City.

Mason, A. – Lee, R. – Jiang, J.X. (2016): Demographic dividends, human capital, and saving. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 7: 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2016.02.004

NTA (2009): National Transfer Accounts, http://ntaccounts.org/. Downloaded: 1 June 2014.

NTA (2016): National Transfer Accounts, http://ntaccounts.org/. Downloaded: 10 June 2016.

Roudi-Fahimi, F. – Kent, M.M. (2007): Challenges and Opportunities – The Population of the Middle East and North Africa. Population Bulletin, 62(2).

Silver, M. (1965): Births, Marriages, and Business Cycles in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 73(3): 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1086/259013

Simonovits, A. (2009): Népességöregedés, tb-nyugdíj és megtakarítás – parametrikus nyugdíjreformok (Population aging, the public pension system and savings: Parametric pension reforms). Közgazdasági Szemle, 56(4): 297–321.

Smith, A. (1776): An inquiry into the wealth of nations. London: Strahan and Cadell.

Sobotka, T. – Skirbekk, V. – Philipov, D. (2011): Economic Recession and Fertility in the Developed World. Population and Development Review, 37(2): 267–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00411.x

Solow, R.M. (1956): A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1): 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513

UNESCO (2016): Education: Mean Years of Schooling. http://data.uis.unesco.org/Index.aspx?queryid=242. Accessed: 20 May 2016.

UN (2015): United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, DVD Edition.

Van de Kaa, D.J. (2010): Demographic transition. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, 1, pp. 65–103.

Varga, G. (2014). Demográfiai átmenet, gazdasági növekedés és a nyugdíjrendszer fenntarthatósága (Demographic transition, economic growth and sustainability of the pension system). Közgazdasági Szemle 61(11): 1279–1318.

Vargha, L. – Donehower, G. (2016): The Quantity-Quality Tradeoff: A Cross-Country Comparison of Market and Nonmarket Investments per Child in Relation to Fertility. Paper presented at the European Population Conference, 1–3 September 2016, Mainz.

Willis, R.J. (1973): A New Approach to the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), pp. S14–S64. https://doi.org/10.1086/260152