Author information:
Mihály Szoboszlai: Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Economic Analyst. E-mail: szoboszlaim@mnb.hu
Abstract:
In the period 2010–2015, the Hungarian employment rate recorded an outstanding increase even by European standards. During this period, the Hungarian Central Statistical Office recorded a 9 per cent increase in the number of employees, coupled with a 15.5 per cent rise in net real wages. This study presents the evolution of these indicators broken down by income groups. In addition to number of employees and labour incomes, changes in the total compensation of pension and social benefit recipients are also discussed in the study. Calculations are based on the 2010 and 2015 data waves of the household budget statistics. One disadvantage of using these data, however, is that they are distorted along the income distribution due to the phenomenon that high earners are typically represented by a low number of observations. The study presents a two-step recalibration procedure with previously unused cohort formation that addresses the aforementioned coverage deficiency with adjustment to external data sources. The material well-being of different household income groups can be tracked in the database produced by the applied method, and the macroeconomic indicators can be supplemented by pieces of distribution information. According to the results defined as the difference between the two years’ data under review, the employment growth in the interim period was determined by the employment of the two lower income quintiles. In the assessment of social benefits, with the limited information available, the chosen tool does not provide a comprehensive view of the changes in these income categories; therefore, the quantified differences between the reweighted sample years’ data should be considered with caution. Broken down by income group, real wage indices exhibited considerable fluctuations.
Cite as (APA):
Szoboszlai, M. (2018). Disaggregated Household Incomes in Hungary Based on the Comparative Analysis of the Reweighted Household Surveys of 2010 and 2015. Financial and Economic Review, 17(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.25201/FER.17.2.99123
Column:
Study
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:
D31, D33, J31
Keywords:
Income, income distribution, wage distribution, well-being, household statistics, reweighting
References:
Békési, L. – Köber, Cs. – Kucsera, H. – Várnai, T. – Világi, B. (2016): The macroeconomic forecasting model of the MNB. MNB Working Papers Series, No. 4.
Benczúr, P. – Kátay, G. – Kiss, Á. – Reizer, B. – Szoboszlai, M. (2011): Analysis of changes in the tax and transfer system with a behavioural microsimulation model. MNB Bulletin, October: 15–27.
Benczúr, P. – Kátay, G. – Kiss, Á. (2012): Assessing changes of the Hungarian tax and transfer system: A general equilibrium microsimulation approach. MNB Working Papers Series, No. 7.
Benedek, D. – Kiss, Á. (2011): Mikroszimulációs elemzés a személyi jövedelemadó módosításainak hatásvizsgálatában (Micro-simulation analysis in examination of the effects of personal income-tax changes). Közgazdasági Szemle, 58(February): 97−110
Creedy, J. (2003): Survey reweighting for tax microsimulation modelling. Treasury Working Paper Series No. 17, New Zealand Treasury
Cseres-Gergely, Zs. – Molnár, Gy. – Szabó, T. (2016): Pénzt vagy életet? Empirikus eredmények néhány gazdaságpolitikai beavatkozás heterogén jóléti hatásairól (For money or for life? Empirical findings on the heterogeneous welfare effects of some economic policy interventions). Közgazdasági Szemle, 63(9): 901–943. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2016.9.901
Cserháti, I. – Keresztély, T. (2010): A megfigyelési egységektől a makrogazdasági aggregátumokig – a mikroszimulációs modellezés néhány módszertani kérdése (From observation units to macroeconomic aggregates – A few methodological issues of microsimulation modelling). Statisztikai Szemle, 88(7–8): 789–802.
Darroch, J.N. – Ratcliff, D. (1972): Generalized Iterative Scaling for Log-Linear Models. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 43(5): 1470–1480. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177692379
Deville, J.C. – Särndal, C.E. (1992): Calibration estimators in survey sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87: 376–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10475217
Di Meglio, E. – Montaigne F. (2013): Registers, timeliness and comparability: Experiences from EU-SILC. In: Jäntti, M. – Veli-Matti Törmälehto, V-M. – Marlier, E. (eds.): The use of registers in the context of EU–SILC: challenges and opportunities. Pp. 39–56.
Éltető, Ö. – Havasi, É. (1998): Mikroszimulációs kísérlet a családtámogatások hatásvizsgálatára (A microsimulation experiment for the impact assessment of family allowances). Statisztikai Szemle, 76(4): 324–340.
Éltető, Ö. – Havasi, É. (2002a): Az elemzési egység és az ekvivalenciaskála megválasztásának hatása a jövedelmi egyenlőtlenségre és szegénységre (Impact of choice of equivalence scale on income inequality and on poverty measures). Szociológiai Szemle, 12(4): 157–170.
Éltető, Ö. – Mihályffy, L. (2002b): Household Surveys in Hungary. Statistics in Transition, 5(4): 521–540.
Hagenaars, A. – de Vos, K. – Zaidi, M.A. (1994): Poverty statistics in the late 1980s: Research based on microdata. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg
Hosszú, Zs. (2011): Pre-crisis household consumption behaviour and its heterogeneity according to income, on the basis of micro statistics. MNB Bulletin, October: 28–35.
HCSO (2009): GNI inventory. (Hungarian version). Online: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/modsz/gni_inventory_ver2.1hun.pdf. Downloaded: 20 September 2017
HCSO (2011): Háztartási költségvetési és életkörülmény adatfelvétel 2010-re (Household budget and living conditions survey 2010). Online: http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/mo/mo2010.pdf. (Chapter 5)
HCSO (2016): Háztartási költségvetési és életkörülmény adatfelvétel 2015-re (Household budget and living conditions survey 2015). Online: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/hazteletszinv/hazteletszinv15.pdf. Downloaded: 20 September 2017
Molnár, Gy. (2005): Az adatállomány és a rotációs panel (Dataset and the rotation panel). In: Kapitány, Zs. – Molnár, Gy. – Virág, I. (eds): Háztartások a tudás- és munkapiacon (Households in the knowledge and labour markets). KTI Könyvek. MTA Közgazdaságtudományi Intézet. Budapest. Pp. 141–147.
OECD (1982): The OECD List of Social Indicators. OECD social indicator development programme, 5th Series, Paris
OECD (2008): Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries. Paris. Online: https://www.oecd.org/els/soc/41527936.pdf. Downloaded: 20 September 2017
OECD (2011): Divided We Stand – Why Inequality Keeps Rising, Paris. Online: http://www.oecd.org/social/inequality.htm. Downloaded: 20 September 2017
ONYF (2010): Statistical Yearbook of the Central Administration of National Pension Insurance 2010. ONYF Kiadványok. Online: https://www.onyf.hu/m/pdf/onyf_statisztikai_evkonyv_2010.pdf. Downloaded: 20 September 2017
ONYF (2015): Statistical Yearbook of the Central Administration of National Pension Insurance 2015. ONYF Kiadványok. Online: https://www.onyf.hu/m/pdf/Statisztika/ONYF_Statisztikai_Eevkoenyv_2015_nyomdai.pdf. Downloaded: 20 September 2017
Pacifico, D. (2014): sreweight: A Stata command to reweight survey data to external totals. Stata Journal, 14(1): 4–21.
Révész, T. (1995): Háztartás-statisztika – érvényességvizsgálat (Household statistics – Validity control). Statisztikai Szemle, 73(1): 31–49.
Stiglitz, J. – Sen, A. – Fitoussi, J.P. (2009): Report of the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris. Online: http://library.bsl.org.au/jspui/bitstream/1/1267/1/Measurement_of_economic_performance_and_social_progress.pdf. Downloaded: 20 September 2017
Szoboszlai, M. – Bögöthy, Z. – Mosberger, P. – Berta, D. (2018): A 2010–2017 közötti adó- és transzferváltozások elemzése mikroszimulációs modellel (An analysis of tax and transfer changes in 2010–2017 with a microsimulation model). MNB Occasional Papers, No. 135. Online: https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/mnb-tanulma-ny-135-vegleges.pdf
UN (2000): Classifications of Expenditure According to Purpose: Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG); Classification of Individual Consumption According to Purpose (COICOP); Classification of the Purposes of Non-Profit Institutions Serving Households (COPNI); Classification of the Outlays of Producers According to Purpose (COPP). Statistical Papers, Series M, No. 84, United Nations Publication, Sales No. E.00.XVII.6. Online: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/SeriesM/SeriesM_84E.pdf. Downloaded: 20 September 2017
UN (2007): Register-based statistics in the Nordic countries. Review of best practises with focus on population and social statistics. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. New York and Geneva. Online: http://www.unece.org/index.php?id=17470. Downloaded: 14 February 2018