The Transparency of Credit Ratings – Reconstruction of Hungary's Sovereign Rating

25 September 2018DOI: https://doi.org/10.25201/FER.17.3.2956

Author information:

Gábor Hajnal: Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Intern; Corvinus University of Budapest, Master’s Student. (When the paper was first submitted, he was a Bachelor’s Student at the John Von Neumann University.). E-mail:

Nóra Szűcs: John Von Neumann University, full-time Research Fellow, Corvinus University of Budapest, part-time Senior Lecturer. E-mail:

Abstract:

After the crisis that commenced in 2008, the observed procyclicality and the slow responses of the credit rating institutions to credit risk events cast strong doubts on the justification of the major role of the credit rating agencies in the financial markets and the reliability of their ratings. Therefore, this case study examines the extent to which the reconstruction of the foreign currency denominated debt ratings of Hungary, as a sovereign issuer, can be implemented accurately under the present transparency of the credit rating processes, i.e. to what degree the indicative rating range, obtained on the basis of the credit rating agencies’ methodology, explains the actual credit rating. Using the publicly available methodological documentation of Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s and Fitch Ratings, we performed the model calculation of Hungary’s credit rating at the three institutions. Although the level of transparency of the three rating agencies has improved, ratings for Hungary could only be reconstructed with some uncertainty. Major progress could only be achieved if the rating agencies calculated the input indicators of the model from known data sources with known calculation at all times.

Cite as (APA):

Hajnal, G., & Szűcs, N. (2018). The Transparency of Credit Ratings – Reconstruction of Hungary's Sovereign Rating. Financial and Economic Review, 17(3), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.25201/FER.17.3.2956

PDF download
The works on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Column:

Study

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:

F34, G15, G24

Keywords:

credit rating agency, sovereign credit rating, credit rating methodology

References:

Afonso, A. (2003): Understanding the determinants of sovereign debt ratings: Evidence for the two leading agencies. Journal of Economics and Finance, 27(1): 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02751590

Afonso, A. – Gomes, P. – Rother, P. (2011): Short- and long-run determinants of sovereign debt credit ratings. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 16(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.416

Afonso, A. – Furceri, D. – Gomes, P. (2012): Sovereign credit ratings and financial markets linkages: Application to European data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(3): 606–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.01.016

Benmelech, E. – Dlugosz, J. (2009): The credit rating crisis. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c11794.pdf. Downloaded: 27 July 2018.

Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, E. (2005): An analysis of the determinants of sovereign ratings. Global Finance Journal, 15(3): 251–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2004.03.004

Brúha, J. – Karber, M. – Pierluigi, B. – Setzer, R. (2017): Understanding sovereign rating movements in euro area countries. ECB Working Paper Series. No. 2011. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp2011.en.pdf?d2f1e2a1f194476ea4a248e495bc7422. Downloaded: 18 March 2018.

Crotty, J. (2009): Structural causes of the global financial crisis: A critical assessment of the new financial architecture. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(4): 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep023

European Council (2009): Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies. Official Journal of the European Union, 52(November): 1–31. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2009.302.01.0001.01.ENG. Downloaded: 18 November 2017.

European Council (2011): Regulation (EU) No 513/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on credit rating agencies. Official Journal of the European Union, 54(May): 30–56. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/25220d7b-b430-4f99-8b90-f9e549a8e9ac/language-en. Downloaded: 18 November 2017.

Fennel, D. – Medvedev, A. (2011): An economic analysis of credit rating agency business models and ratings accuracy. Financial Services Authority Occasional Paper Series, No. 41, November: 1–38.

Fitch Ratings (2017a): Sovereign Rating Criteria. https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/901261. Downloaded: 4 March 2018.

Fitch Ratings (2017b): Hungary – Rating Action Report. https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/906292. Downloaded: 3 March 2018.

Fitch Ratings (2018): Fitch Affirms Hungary at ‘BBB–’; Outlook Positive. https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10022897. Downloaded: 2 March 2018.

IMF (2010): Global Financial Stability Report. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfsr/2010/02/. Downloaded: 10 November 2017.

Iyengar, S. (2012): The Credit Rating Agencies – Are They Reliable? A Study of Sovereign Ratings. Vikalpa, 37(1): 69–82. http://www.vikalpa.com/pdf/articles/2012/volume-37-1-Pages-from-69-82.pdf

Jorion, P. (1999): A kockáztatott érték (The value at risk). Panem Kft. p. 311.

Langhor, M. – Langhor, T. (2010): The rating agencies and their credit ratings. What They Are, How They Work, And Why They Are Relevant. Wiley. pp. 366–370.

Ligeti, I. (2016): A hitelminősítések kulisszatitkai 1. rész. Magyarország felminősítését az adósságráta további várható csökkenése hozhatja el a Moody’s-nál (Secrets behind the scenes of credit rating, Part 1. The upgrading of Hungary by Moody’s may be entailed by anticipated further decrease in the debt ratio). Short article, Magyar Nemzeti Bank. https://www.mnb.hu/kiadvanyok/szakmai-cikkek/tovabbi-szakmai-cikkek/ligeti-imre-a-hitelminositesek-kulisszatitkai-1-resz-magyarorszag-felminositeset-az-adossagrata-tovabbi-varhato-csokkenese-hozhatja-el-a-moody-s-nal. Downloaded: 7 October 2017.

Ligeti, I. – Szőrfi, Zs. (2016): Methodological issues of credit rating – Are sovereign credit rating actions reconstructible? Financial and Economic Review, 15(1): 7–32. http://english.hitelintezetiszemle.hu/letoltes/1-ligeti-szorfi-1.pdf

Magyar Nemzeti Bank (2017): A Magyar Nemzeti Bank 11/2017. (XI.06.) számú ajánlása a hitelkockázat méréséről, kezeléséről és kontrolljáról (Recommendation 11/2017 (XI.06.) of the Magyar Nemzeti Bank on the measurement, management and control of credit risk). https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/11-2017-hitelkockazati-ajanlas.pdf. Downloaded: May 2018.

Melnick, L. (2008): Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment, Volume I. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 910–914.

Moody’s (2015): Rating Methodology. Sovereign Bond Ratings. https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_186644&WT.mc_id=RateSov. Downloaded: 12 October 2017.

Moody’s (2016a): Rating Methodology. Sovereign Bond Ratings. https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1044859. Downloaded: 22 November 2017.

Moody’s (2016b): Moody’s upgrades Hungary’s government bond ratings to Baa3; stable outlook. https://www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-upgrades-Hungarys-government-bond-ratings-to-Baa3-stable-outlook--PR_357338. Downloaded: 21 November 2017.

O’Sullivan, P. – Smith, M. – Esposito, M. (2012): Business Ethics. A critical approach: integrating ethics across the business world. Routledge. pp. 154–158.

Standard & Poor’s (2017a): Sovereign Rating Methodology. https://www.standardandpoors.com/en_EU/web/guest/article/-/view/sourceId/10221157. Downloaded: 22 February 2018.

Standard & Poor’s (2017b): Hungary ‘BBB–/A–3’ Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Stable. https://www.standardandpoors.com/en_US/web/guest/article/-/view/type/HTML/id/1849431. Downloaded: 19 September 2017.

Standard & Poor’s (2018): Hungary ‘BBB–/A–3’ Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Positive. https://www.standardandpoors.com/en_US/web/guest/article/-/view/type/HTML/id/1995528. Downloaded: 15 March 2018.

Tirole, J. (2006): The Theory of Corporate Finance. Princeton University Press. pp. 75–144.

Utzig, S. (2010): The Financial Crisis and the Regulation of Credit Rating Agencies: A European Banking Perspective. ADBI Working Paper No. 188. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1592834

Vidovics-Dancs, Á. (2013): Államcsődök. Tények és alapfogalmak újragondolva (Sovereign defaults. Facts and Basic Concepts Rethought). Hitelintézeti Szemle, 12(4): 285–305.

Vidovics-Dancs, Á. (2014): Az államcsőd költségei régen és ma (Costs of sovereign default long ago and now). Közgazdasági Szemle, 61(March): 262–278.

Vidovics-Dancs, Á. (2015): Államcsődök nyomában (Sovereign defaults). Doctoral (PhD) thesis, Doctoral School of General and Quantitative Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest http://doi.org/10.14267/phd.2015027

White, L.J. (2010): Markets: The Credit Rating Agencies. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2): 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.211