Optimising Nobel Prize Laureates

27 March 2019DOI: https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.18.1.125141

Author information:

Dietmar Meyer: German-language Andrássy University Budapest, Rector. E-mail:

Abstract:

The Nobel Prize, which has existed since 1901, is awarded to persons (and on rare occasion to institutions) who have achieved outstanding results in physics, chemistry, medicine, literature and the pursuit of peace. The history of the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences – awarded for the first time in 1969 and officially known as the ‘Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel’ – shows a slightly different picture, since in the first two decades it was awarded to still living “doyens” of this branch of science (Frisch, Tinbergen, Hicks, Myrdal, Hayek, Haavelmo, Coase – just to mention a few of them). In recent years, this prize serves primarily for the recognition of research results: In 1994, 2005, 2007, 2012 and 2014 the prize was awarded to scientists excelling in various game theories, in 1996 and 2001 to experts working in the field of asymmetric information, and in 2002 to experts researching the link between psychology and economic science. In 2010 and 2016, the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences was awarded in the field of labour market analysis and contract theory, respectively. It appears as if the Committee awarding the prize first chose a generally topical subject matter and then award the Prize to experts who are successful and produce outstanding results in that field. 2018 was no exception. Although the laudation of the two laureates – William Nordhaus and Paul Romer – mentions their excellent scientific achievement, as they received the Prize “for their work analysing the impact of climate change on global economy, and related to the endogenous growth theory”, a more detailed analysis shows that here again there is a very strong link between the two scientists in terms of content and methodology, since the problem of sustainability and the application of the optimisation procedures, mentioned in the title, also connects them.

Cite as (APA):

Meyer, D. (2019). Optimising Nobel Prize Laureates. Financial and Economic Review, 18(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.18.1.125141

PDF download
The works on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Column:

Essay

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:

B22, O40, O44

Keywords:

endogenous growth theory, sustainability, climate change

References:

Arrow, K.J. (1961): The Economic Implication of Learning by Doing. Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Bekker, Zs. (editor, 2005): Közgazdasági Nobel-díjasok 1969–2004 (Nobel Prize Laureates in Economic Sciences). Complex Kiadó, Budapest.

Bellmann, R. (1954): The Theory of Dynamic Programming. The Rand Cooperation, Santa Monica, California.

Dorfman, R. (1969): An Economic Interpretation of Optimal Control Theory. American Economic Review, 59(5): 817–831.

Feldman, G.A. (1967): A nemzetközi jövedelem növekedési ütemének elméletéhez (To the theory of the growth rate of international revenue). Közgazdasági Szemle, 14(11): 1342–1382.

Jevons, W.St. (1871): The Theory of Political Economy. MacMillan, London.

Káldor, N. (1957): A Model of Economic Growth. The Economic Journal, 67(268): 591–624. https://doi.org/10.2307/2227704

Nordhaus, W.D. (1975a): The Political Business Cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 42(2): 169–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296528

Nordhaus, W.D. (1975b): Can We Control Carbon Dioxide? International Institute for Applied System Analysis, Luxemburg, Working Paper.

Nordhaus, W.D. (1977): Strategies for the Control of Carbon Dioxide. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, Working Paper No. 443.

Nordhaus, W.D. (1991): To slow or not to slow: the economics of the greenhouse effect. Economic Journal, 101(407): 920–937. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233864

Nordhaus, W.D. (1992): The ‘Dice’ Model: Background and Structure of a Dynamic Integrated Climate-Economy Model of the Economics of Global Warming. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, Working Paper No. 1009.

Palomba, G. (1939): Introduzione allo studio della dinamica economica. Napoli, Eugenio Jovene.

Pontrjagin, L.S. – Boltyanszkij, V.G. – Gamkrelidze, R.V. – Miscsenko, E.F. (1968): Optimális folyamatok elmélete (Theory of optimal processes). Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó, Budapest.

Romer, P. (1986a): Cake Eating, Chattering, and Jumps. Existence Results for Variational Problems. Econometrica, 54(4): 897–908. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912842

Romer, P.(1986b): Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5): 1002–1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420

Romer, P. (1990): Endogenous Technological Change. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725

Solow, R.M. (1956): A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1): 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513

Solow, R.M. (1957): Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3): 312–320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047