Author information:
Dániel Béres: Budapest Metropolitan University, Associate Professor. E-mail: dberes@metropolitan.hu
Abstract:
This study presents how financial benchmarks have become beacons for the world of economy and finance. Through the example of the Budapest Interbank Offered Rate (hereinafter: BUBOR), the study evaluates the practical applicability of the methods that may be used to prevent or detect attempts at manipulating interbank rates used as financial benchmarks. It points out that a payment system-based financial benchmark model could contribute significantly to eliminating the manipulation risk associated with the fixing of benchmark rates. The author reviews the extent to which the given benchmark (BUBOR) is exposed to potential manipulation attempts in two different periods, each comprising 6 scenarios. He finds that a low interest rate environment and the low standard deviation of the fixing submissions combined with the methodology applied essentially reduced the manipulation potential to almost zero. This also means that in periods of less volatile fixing submissions it is justified and substantiated to reduce the resources spent on supervising and auditing the production process of benchmark rates. Introducing specific methods may prompt an adjustment on the part of the banks contributing to the fixing (panel banks), which may weaken or strengthen the efficiency of the method concerned.
Cite as (APA):
Béres, D. (2019). Integrity of Financial Benchmarks. Financial and Economic Review, 18(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.18.1.3359
Column:
Study
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:
B25, B26, C10, C52, D53, D69, G28
Keywords:
interbank offered rate, benchmark rate, methodology, BUBOR, LIBOR, manipulation
References:
Altunbas, Y. – Gadanecz, B. – Kara, A. (2006): The evolution of syndicated loan markets. The Service Industries Journal, 26(6): 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060600851129
Borszéki, É. (2009): Bevezetés a nemzetközi pénzügyekbe (An Introduction to International Finance). Szent István University. Gödöllő.
Brousseau, V. – Chailloux, A. – Durré, A. (2009): Interbank Offered Rate: Effects of the Financial Crisis on the Information Content of the Fixing. IÉSEG School of Management Working Paper, No. 2009-ECO-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1635890
Choy, M. – Shung, K. P. – Chng, E. (2012): Interest Rate Manipulation Detection using Time Series Clustering Approach. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.2878.pdf. Downloaded: 15 August 2018.
Csizmadia, P. (2014): The Research of the Global Crisis’s Impact on the Hungarian Markets of Interest Rate Products. PhD Dissertation, University of West Hungary. http://doktori.nyme.hu/471/3/Csizmadia_Peter_angol_tezis.pdf
Cutler, D. – Ridley, K. (2013): Timeline: How the LIBOR Scandal Unfolded. REUTERS. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-libor-rbs-scandal/timeline-how-the-libor-scandal-unfolded-idUSBRE9150TB20130206. Downloaded: 2 August 2018.
ECB (2018): ESTER Methodology and policies. European Central Bank, Frankfurt. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/initiatives/interest_rate_benchmarks/shared/pdf/ecb.ESTER_methodology_and_policies.en.pdf. Downloaded: 2 February 2019.
Eisl, A. – Jankowitsch, R. – Subrahmanyam, M. G. (2017): The Manipulation Potential of LIBOR and EURIBOR. European Financial Management, 23(4): 604–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12126
Erhart, Sz. – Mátrai, R. (2015): The most important steps of BUBOR reforms led by the Central Bank of Hungary in an international comparison. Financial and Economic Review, 14(1):139–165. http://english.hitelintezetiszemle.hu/letoltes/6-erhart-matrai-en.pdf
Farkas, R. – Mosolygó, Zs. – Páles, J. (2004): A kamatswappiac hazai perspektívái adósságkezelési megközelítésből (Domestic Prospects of the Interest Rate Swap Market from a Debt Management Perspective). Hitelintézeti Szemle, 3(6):1–24. http://www.bankszovetseg.hu/Content/Hitelintezeti/46Farkas.pdf
Fliszár, V. (2016): Budapest Interbank Offered Rate in the Shadow of London Interbank Offered Rate. PhD Dissertation, Corvinus University of Budapest. http://phd.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/901/3/Fliszar_Vilmos_ten.pdf
Frost, J. (2017): Introducing the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR). Federal Reserve Bank of New York, ARRC Roundtable, New York. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/newsevents/speeches/2017/Frostpresentation.pdf. Downloaded: 2 February 2019.
Gadanecz, B. (2004): The syndicated loan market: structure, development and implications. BIS Quarterly Review, 2004(December): 75–89.
Gereben, Á. (2000): The Interbank Money Market in Hungary (Lessons from the Period between September 1998 and March 1999). MNB Occasional Papers, No. 7. https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/op-7.pdf. Downloaded: 22 August 2018.
Gyntelberg, J. – Wooldridge, P. (2008): Interbank rate fixings during the recent turmoil. BIS Quarterly Review, 2008 (March): 59–72.
Hardin, G. (1968): The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859): 1243–1248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
Horváth, D. – Makay, E. (2015): Analysis methodology of interbank reference rates − International trends and the results of the first Hungarian annual statistical analysis for 2014. Financial and Economic Review, 14(2): 62–87. http://english.hitelintezetiszemle.hu/letoltes/3-horvath-makay-en.pdf
Horváth, D. – Kálmán, P. – Kolozsi, P. P. (2017): A BUBOR és a hazai bankközi piac fejlesztése (The BUBOR and the Development of the Hungarian Interbank Market). In: Magyar Nemzeti Bank: A magyar út – célzott jegybanki politika (The Hungarian Way – Targeted Central Bank Policy), pp. 497–526
IOSCO (2013): Principles for Financial Benchmarks. https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD415.pdf. Downloaded: 10 July, 2018.
Kocsis, Z. – Csávás, Cs. – Mák, I. – Pulai, Gy. (2013): Kamatderivatíva-piacok Magyarországon 2009 és 2012 között a K14-es adatszolgáltatás tükrében (Interest rate derivative markets in Hungary between 2009 and 2012 in light of the K14 dataset). MNB Occasional Papers 107. https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/mt107.pdf. Downloaded: 1 February 2019.
Kuprianov, A. (1993): Over-the-Counter Interest Rate Derivatives. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 79(3): 65–94.
MNB (2000): A BUBOR szerepe a monetáris politika működtetésében és a kamattranszmisszióban – Feljegyzés a Pénzpiaci Konzultatív Fórum részére (BUBOR’s role in operating the monetary policy and interest rate transmission – Note for the Money Market Consultative Forum). https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/forum-2000062002.pdf. Downloaded: 11 August 2018.
MNB (2018): Regulation on the fixing procedure of the Budapest Interbank Offered Rate, on the fixing requirements, and on the rules of conduct of panel banks. https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/bubor-regulation-en.pdf. Downloaded: 15 August 2018.
Mollencamp, C. (2008): Bankers Cast Doubt On Key Rate Amid Crisis. The Wall Street Journal.
Monticini, A. – Thornton, D. L. (2013): The Effect of Underreporting on LIBOR rates. Fed. http://www.monticini.eu/pub/libscandal.pdf. Downloaded: 3 September 2018.
Ridley, K. – Jones, H. (2012): A Greek Banker Spills on the Early Days of the Libor and his First Deal with the Shah of Iran. Reuters. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/history-of-the-libor-rate-2012-8. Downloaded: 15 August 2018.
Sajtos, L. – Mitev, A. (2007): SPSS kutatási és adatelemzési kézikönyv (The Handbook of SPSS Research and Data Analysis). Alinea Kiadó. Budapest.
Tarján M., T. (2018): 1947. június 5. A Marshall-terv meghirdetése (5 June 1947 – The Announcement of the Marshall Plan). Rubicon. http://www.rubicon.hu/magyar/oldalak/1947_junius_5_a_marshall_terv_meghirdetese/. Downloaded: 18 August 2018.