Author information:
Bálint Dancsik: Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Senior Economist. E-mail: dancsikb@mnb.hu
Nedim Márton El-Meouch: Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Junior Analyst. E-mail: elmeouchn@mnb.hu
Abstract:
In our study we examine what portion of variable interest rate mortgages can be profitably and realistically refinanced on a market basis, in the light of remaining maturity, the current one-off costs of refinancing and the prevailing interest rate spread. To that end, relying on microdata we applied various methods (from using the simple banking sector average spread to applying a linear regression model) to estimate the interest rate spread at which debtors would be able to take out a new, variable-rate loan. If the estimated spread of the new loan is adequately low, refinancing may be a financially rewarding option for the debtor. According to our results, 22–31 per cent of the variable interest rate mortgage loans disbursed prior to 2015 could be refinanced in this way assuming conservative lending conditions. Although we focused on the refinancing of variable-rate loans with other variable-rate loans directly, our results also indicate that on a market basis, there may be limited room for refinancing variable-rate loans with fixed-rate loans and hence, for mitigating the interest rate risk of the household sector. In our opinion, by easing the obstacles to loan refinancing, the recommendation of the Magyar Nemzeti Bank on interest rate risk may considerably raise the share of debtors switching to fixed-rate loans.
Cite as (APA):
Dancsik, B., & El-Meouch, N. M. (2019). Who Can Refinance? The Possibilities and Limitations of Market-based Refinancing in the Case of Mortgages with a Variable Interest Rate. Financial and Economic Review, 18(2), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.18.2.530
Column:
Study
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:
D14, E43, G21, G41
Keywords:
mortgage loan, variable interest rate, interest rate risk, loan refinancing
References:
Aczél, Á. – Banai, Á. – Borsos, A. – Dancsik, B. (2016): Identifying the determinants of housing loan margins in the Hungarian banking system. Financial and Economic Review, 15(4): 5–44. http://english.hitelintezetiszemle.hu/letoltes/akos-aczel-adam-banai-andras-borsos-balint-dancsik.pdf
Agarwal, S. – Driscoll, J.C. – Laibson, D.I. (2013): Optimal Mortgage Refinancing: A Closed- Form Solution. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45(4): 591–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12017
Agarwal, S. – Rosen, R.J. – Yao, V. (2016): Why Do Borrowers Make Mortgage Refinancing Mistakes? Management Science, 62(12): 3494–3509. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2272
Albertazzi, U. – Fringuellotti, F. – Ongena, S. (2018): Fixed rate versus adjustable rate mortgages: Evidence from euro area banks. Banca D’Italia Working Paper, No. 1176. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3210730
Badarinza, C. – Campbell, J.Y. – Ramadorai, T. (2018): What Calls to ARMs? International Evidence on Interest Rates and the Choice of Adjustable-Rate Mortgages. Management Sciences, 64(5): 2275–2288. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2629
Bajo, E. – Barbi, M. (2018): Financial illiteracy and mortgage refinancing decisions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 94(C): 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.08.001
Basten, C. – Guin, B. – Koch, C. (2018): How do banks and households manage interest rate risk? Evidence from mortgage applications and banks’ responses. Bank of England Staff Working Paper, No. 733. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3192943
Berlinger, E. (2017): Why APRC is misleading and how it should be reformed. Corvinus Economics Working Papers, 5/2017.
Calza, A. – Monacelli, T. – Stracca, L. (2013): Housing Finance and Monetary Policy. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(1): 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01095.x
Chang, Y. – Yavas, A. (2009): Do Borrowers Make Rational Choices on Points and Refinancing? Real Estate Economics, 37(4): 635–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2009.00258.x
Dancsik, B. (2017): Számít-e a devizahiteles múlt? A lakáshitelkamatok rögzítéséről szóló döntés vizsgálata mikroszintű adatokon (Analysing the decision of fixing housing loan interest rates on micro-level data: does FX loan history matter?). Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review), 64(10): 1030–1055. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2017.10.1030
ECB (2018): Financial Stability Review, May 2018. European Central Bank.
Ehrmann, M. – Ziegelmayer, M. (2014): Household risk management and actual mortgage choice in the euro area. Working Paper Series, No. 1631. European Central Bank.
Follain, R.J. – Tzang, D. (1988): Interest Rate Differential and Refinancing a Home Mortgage.The Appraisal Journal, 56(2): 243–251.
Hoffmann, P. – Langfield, S. – Pierobon, F. – Vuillemey, G. (2018): Who bears interest rate risk? Working Paper, No. 2176. European Central Bank. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhy113
Ippolito, F. – Ozdagli, A.K. – Perez-Orive, A. (2018): The transmission of monetary policy through bank lending: The floating rate channel. Journal of Monetary Economics, 95(May): 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.02.001
Koijen, R.S.J. – Van Hemert, O. – Van Nieuwerburgh, S. (2009): Mortgage Timing. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2): 292–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.005
Mérő, B. – Vágó, N. (2018): Keresletvezérelt lakáspiaci modell a lakáshitelezést szabályozó makroprudenciális eszközök tanulmányozására (A demand-led model of the housing market for studying the macro-prudential means of regulating housing loans). Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review), 65(11): 1115–1153. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2018.11.1115
MNB (2017): Financial Stability Report, November 2017. Magyar Nemzeti Bank.
MNB (2018a): Growth Report, November 2018. Magyar Nemzeti Bank.
MNB (2018b): Financial Stability Report, November 2018. Magyar Nemzeti Bank.
MNB (2019): Financial Stability Report, May 2019. Magyar Nemzeti Bank.