Issues and Types of Adverse Selection and Negative Selection

26 June 2019DOI: https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.18.2.87116

Author information:

László Csorba: Eszterházy Károly University, Senior Lecturer. E-mail:

Abstract:

In a relatively high number of cases, there are selection criteria in everyday life, the implementation of which clearly does not support the development of the economy, even in the short term. At the same time, the phenomenon of adverse selection raises its head relatively rarely in reality, since it is equally dependent on the preconditions of a high degree of hidden information and the complete good faith of the stakeholders. In comparison, negative selection is – by necessity – a more frequent case. In such cases, the relevant information is available to the parties. At the same time, the individual or group possessing the information consciously abuses their dominant position. Moreover, this specifically disadvantages those who currently best comply with the existing selection requirements, but in spite of this are vulnerable due to the lack of a proper negotiating position or interest-asserting capability. However, the dominant position or power possessed by the relevant party can also be used “according to its intended purpose”, which enables the implementation of positive selection that is very likely to promote development.

Cite as (APA):

Csorba, L. (2019). Issues and Types of Adverse Selection and Negative Selection. Financial and Economic Review, 18(2), 87–116. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.18.2.87116

PDF download
The works on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Column:

Study

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:

D81, D82, D92, E32, L15

Keywords:

economic evolution, economic selection, adverse selection, negative selection, market structure, stakeholder theories

References:

Ajzen, I. (1991): The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Akerlof, G.A. (1970): The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3): 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431

Akerlof, G.A. – Klenow, J. (2009): Why Doesn’t Capitalism Flow to Poor Countries? Comments and Discussion. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 2009. pp. 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.0.0061

Aoki, M. (1984): The co-operative game theory of the firm. Oxford, Clarendon Press, p. 229.

Arrow, K.J. (1979): Információ és gazdasági viselkedés. (Information and economic behavior). pp. 367–382. In: Arrow K.J. (1979): Egyensúly és döntés – válogatott tanulmányok (Equilibrium and decision – selected studies). Budapest, KJK, 411. p

Avilés, L. (2002): Solving the freeloaders paradox: Genetic associations and frequency dependent selection in the evolution of cooperation among nonrelatives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, pp. 14268–14273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.212408299

Bardhan, P. (1997): Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3): 1320–1346.

Barry, B.J.L. (1961): City Size Distributions and Economic Development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 9(4/1): 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1086/449923

Baumol, W.J. (1982): Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure. The American Economic Review, 70(1): 1–15.

Bester, H. (1985): Screening vs. Rationing in Credit Markets with Imperfect Information. The American Economic Review, 75(4): 850–855.

Beinhocker, E.D. (2006): The Origin of Wealth: Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, p. 526.

Bergh, J.C.J.M. van den – M. Stagl, S. (2003): Coevolution of economic behaviour and institutions: towards a theory of institutional change. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13(3): 289–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-003-0158-8

Bergh, J.C.J.M. van den – Gowdy, J.M. (2009): A Group Selection Perspective on Economic Behavior, Institutions and Organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 72(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.017

Besanko, D. – Donnenfeld, S. – White, L.J. (1987): Monopoly and Quality Distortion: Effects and Remedies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(4): 743–768. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884279

Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995): A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994

Deng, K.G. (2003): Development and Its Deadlock in Imperial China, 221 B.C.–1840 A.D. Economic Development and Culture Change, 51(2): 479–522. https://doi.org/10.1086/345732

Diamond, J. (2009): Összeomlás: tanulságok a társadalmak továbbéléséhez. (Collapse – How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed) Typotex Kiadó, Budapest, p. 580.

Dong, D. – Saha, A. (1998): He came, he saw, (and): he waited: an empirical analysis of inertia in technology adoption. Applied Economics, 30(7): 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368498325327

Dosi, G. – Nelson, R.R. (1994): An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4(3): 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01236366

Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989): Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

Forgács, I. (2013): Miért nincs (soha) elég pénz az egészségügyre? (Why is (never) enough money for health care?) Interdiszciplináris Magyar Egészségügy (Interdisciplinary Hungarian Health Care), 12(7): 5–9.

Freeman, R.E. (1984): Strategic Management – A Stakeholder Approach. London, Pitman Books, p. 292.

Freeman, R.E. – Liedtka, J. (1997): Stakeholder Capitalism and the Value Chain. European Management Journal, 15(3): 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00008-X

Friedman, M. (2007): The Methodology of Positive Economics. 145–178. p. In: Hausman, D.M. (ed.): The Philosophy of Economics – an Anthology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 536. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819025.010

Geletkanycz, M. A. (1997): The Salience of “Culture’s Consequences’: The Effects of Cultural Values on Top Executive Commitment to the Status Quo. Strategic Management Journal, 18(8): 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199709)18:8<615::AID-SMJ889>3.0.CO;2-I

Glatz, F. (1997): Kollektív felelősség – kollektív öngyilkosság. Többségek – kisebbségek együttélése (Collective responsibility – collective suicide. Cohabitation of majorities – minorities). História, 1997(2): 8–10.

Graaf, G. de – Huberts, L.W.J.C. (2008): Portraying the Nature of Corruption Using an Explorative Case Study Design. Public Administration Review, 68(4): 640–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00904.x

Greif, A. (2006): Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons of Medieval Trade. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 526. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791307

Guriev, S. (2004): Red tape and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 73(2): 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.06.001

Hagemann, H. (2008): Schumpeter on development. 225–242. p. In: Shionoya, Y. – Nishizawa, T. (eds.): Marshall and Schumpeter on Evolution – Economic Sociology of Capitalist Development. Northampton – Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, p. 285.

Hámori, B. (2002): Érzelem-gazdaságtan – A közgazdasági elemzés kiterjesztése (Economy of feelings – An extension of economic analysis). Budapest, Kossuth Kiadó, p. 224.

Hardin, G. (1968): The Tragedy of Commons. Science, 162(3859): 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243

Harford, T. (2011): Az alkalmazkodás logikája: Miért kezdődik a siker mindig kudarccal? (Adapt: Why Success Always Starts with Failure). HVG Kiadó, Budapest, p. 349.

Heckathorn, D.D. (1993): Collective Action and Group Heterogeneity: Voluntary Provision Versus Selective Incentives. American Sociological Review, 58(3): 329–350. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095904

Heidenheimer, A.J. – Johnston, M. (2011): Political Corruptions: Concepts and Context. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, p. 850.

Hillman, A.L. – Katz, E. (1984): Risk-Averse Rent Seekers and the Social Cost of Monopoly Power. The Economic Journal, 94(373): 104–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232219

Hirschman, A.O. (1995): Kivonulás, tiltakozás, hűség (Exit, Voice, and Loyalty). Osiris Kiadó, Budapest, p. 170.

Huntington, S.P. (1968): Political Order in Changing Societies. Yale University Press, New Haven, p. 500.

Kegan, R. – Lahey, L.L. (2017): Immunis a változásra – Hogyan ismerjük fel és győzzük le önmagunk és csapatunk ellenállását? (Immunity to Change: How to Overcome It and Unlock the Potential in Yourself and Your Organization). HVG Kiadó, Budapest, p. 382.

Kornai, J. (1993): A szocialista rendszer (The Socialist System). Budapest, HVG KiadĂł, p. 670.

Kornai, J. (1997): Pénzügyi fegyelem és puha költségvetési korlát (Financial discipline and soft budget constraint). Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review), 53(11): 940–953.

Kornai, J. (2008): A puha költségvetési korlát szindrómája a kórházi szektorban (The syndrome of the soft budget constraint in the hospital sector). Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review), 55(12): 1037–1056.

Kornai, J. (2010): Innováció és dinamizmus (Innovation and dynamism). Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review), 57(1): 1–36.

Kornai, J. – Maskin, E. – Roland, G. (2004): A puha költségvetési korlát I. (The soft budget constraint I). Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review), 60(7–8): 608–624.

Kotosz, B. (2002): Evolúciós megközelítés a közgazdaságtanban, avagy modellezés versus racionális várakozások (An evolutionary approach in economics, or modelling versus rational expectations) In: Beszteri, B. – Lévai, I. (ed.): Régiók Európája. Studies, Budapest Fórum, Budapest, pp. 111–118.

Laffont, J.J. – Tirole, J. (1988): The Dynamics of Incentive Contracts. Econometrica, 56(5): 1153–1175. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911362

Lambsdorff, J. G. (2002): Corruption and rent-seeking. Public Choice, 113(1–2): 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020320327526

Leff, N.H. (1964): Economic Development Through Bureaucratic Corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3): 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426400800303

Lentner, Cs. (2014): A magyar önkormányzatok adósságkonszolidációja (Debt consolidation of local governments in Hungary). Pénzügyi Szemle (Public Finance Quarterly), 59(3): 330–344.

Major, I. (2014): Ha elfogy a bizalom... Kialakítható-e optimális mechanizmus kétoldalú aszimmetrikus információ esetén? (When trust is lost... Can an optimal mechanism be established in the case of bilateral asymmetric information?). Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review), 61(2): 148–165.

Méon, P.G. – Sekkat, K. (2005): Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth? Public Choice, 122(1): 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3988-0

Milgrom, P. (1987): Adverse Selection without hidden information. Working Paper No. 8742, University of California, Berkeley.

Mitchell, R.K. – Agle, B.R. – Wood, D.J. (1997): Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105

Mo, P.H. (2001): Corruption and Economic Growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(1): 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2000.1703

Mokyr, J. (2004): A gazdaság gépezete (The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress). Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.

Mussa, M. – Rosen, S. (1978): Monopoly and Product Quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18(2): 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(78)90085-6

Narloch, U. – Pascual, U. – Drucker, A.G. (2012): Collective Action Dynamics under External Rewards: Experimental Insights from Andean Farming Communities. World Development, 40(10): 2096–2107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.014

Nazaretyan, A.P. (2003): Power and Wisdom: Toward a History of Social Behavior. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(4): 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-5914.2003.00224.x

Nelson, R.R. (1995): Recent Evolutionary Theorizing About Economic Change. Journal of Economic Literature, 33 (1): 48–90.

Nelson, R.R. – Winter, S.G. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economics Change. London, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, p. 454.

Olson, M. (1965): The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Olson, M. (2008): The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. Yale University Press, New Haven.

Pindyck, R.S. (1985): The Measurement of Monopoly Power in Dynamic Markets. The Journal of Law & Economics, 28(1): 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/467080

Polignac, F. (1995): Cults, Territory, and the Origins of The Greek City State. Chicago – London, University Chicago Press, p. 204.

Rey, P. – Salanié, B. (1996): On the Value of Commitment with Asymmetric Information. Econometrica, 64(6): 1395–1414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171836

Riley, J.G. (1989): Signalling. In: Eatwell, J. – Milgate, M. – Newman, P. (eds.): Allocation, Information and Markets. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Rothschild, M. – Stiglitz, J. (1976): Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(4): 629–649. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885326

Samuelson, W. – Zeckhauser, R. (1988): Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1): 7–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564

Sandlin, J.A. – Mclaren, P. (2010): Exploring Consumption’s Pedagogy and Envisioning a Critical Pedagogy of Consumption – Living and Learning in the Shadow of the “Shopocalypse”. 1–20. p. In: Sandlin, J.A. – Mclaren, P. (eds.): Critical Pedagogies of Consumption – Living and Learning in the Shadow of the “Shopocalypse”. New York -London, Routledge, p. 304.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1980): A gazdasági fejlődés elmélete (The theory of economic development). Budapest, Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó, p. 320.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1942): Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York, Harper and Brothers, p. 431

Shionoya, Y. (2008): Schumpeter and evolution: an ontological exploration. 15-35. p. In: Shionoya, Y. – Nishizawa, T. (eds.): Marshall and Schumpeter on Evolution – Economic Sociology of Capitalist Development. Northampton – Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, p. 285.

Solow, R.M. (1979): Another possible source of wage stickiness. Journal of Macroeconomics, 1(1): 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-0704(79)90022-3

Spence, M.A. (1973): Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3): 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

Stiglitz, J.E. (1975): The Theory of “Screening,” Education, and the Distribution of Income. The American Economic Review, 65(3): 283–300.

Stiglitz, J.E. (1986): The economics of public sector. New York, W. W. Norton & Company, p. 599

Stiglitz, J.E. – Greenwald, B.C. (2016): A tanuló társadalom megteremtése – A növekedés, a fejlődés és a társadalmi haladás kérdéseinek új megközelítése. (Creating a Learning Society – A New Approach to Growth, Development, and Social Progress) Napvilág Kiadó, Budapest, p. 679

Sylvander, B. – Belletti, G. – Marescotti, A. – Thévenod-Mottet, E. (2006): Establishing a quality convention, certifying and promoting the quality of animal products: the case of beef. pp. 61–82 In: Rubino, R. – Sepe, L. – Dimitriadou, A. – Gibon, A. (eds.): Livestock farming systems – product quality on local resources leading to improved sustainability. (EAAP Scientific Series), vol. 118, Benevento, Italy, EAAP Publication, p. 410.

Széchenyi, I. (1930): Hitel (Credit). In: Széchenyi, I. (1930): Gróf Széchenyi István Válogatott munkái (Selected Works of Count Széchenyi István) (1930). Budapest, Lampel Róbert Könyvkereskedés, p. 808.

Tirole, J. (2016): From Bottom of the Barrel to Cream of the Crop: Sequential Screening with Positive Selection. Econometrica, 84(4): 1291–1343. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA12961

Utton, M.A. (2003): Market Dominance and Antitrust Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, p. 342. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843767480

Veblen, T. (1899): The Theory of the Leisure Class. Macmillan, New York – (2007): reprint, New York, Oxford University Press, p. 304

Veblen, T. (1972): A dologtalan osztály elmélete (The Theory of the Leisure Class). Budapest, Közgazdasági és Jogi Kiadó, p. 400.

Vickers, J. (2005): Abuse of Market Power. The Economic Journal, 115(504): F244–F261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01004.x

Vigneault, M. (2005): Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and the Soft Budget Constraint Problem. IIGR Working Paper 2, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, p. 30.

Vincze, J. (1991a): Fejezetek az információ közgazdaságtanából – II. A kontraszelekció (Chapters from the economics of information – II Adverse selection). Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review), 38(3): 289–306.

Vincze, J. (1991b): Fejezetek az információ közgazdaságtanából – III. Morális kockázat és kontraszelekció az időben (Chapters from the economics of information – III Moral hazard and adverse selection in time). Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review), 38(4): 435–445.

Willer, R. (2009): Groups Reward Individual Sacrifice: The Status Solution to the Collective Action Problem. American Sociological Review, 74(1): 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400102

Williamson, O.E. (2000): The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38 (3): 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595