Laffer Curves for Hungary

18 December 2019DOI: https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.18.4.5576

Author information:

Péter Gábriel: Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Head of Department. E-mail:

Lóránt Kaszab: Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Economic Research Expert. E-mail:

Abstract:

The study uses a general equilibrium model calibrated for the Hungarian economy to estimate the Laffer curve of the labour tax rate. According to the results, the tax rate maximising budget revenues in the medium term is 55 per cent, while based on the model version taking into account the accumulation of human capital and capturing the longer-term effects of a tax cut, it is 40 per cent. The simulations showed that the self-financing rate of the reduction of the labour tax rate from its pre-crisis level to the level in 2011 is roughly 80 per cent over the medium term and that it is fully self-financing in the longer run. In the case of additional tax cuts, the self-financing rate diminishes somewhat in line with the lower tax rate at the outset, but remains high.

Cite as (APA):

Gábriel, P., & Kaszab, L. (2019). Laffer Curves for Hungary. Financial and Economic Review, 18(4), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.18.4.5576

PDF download
The works on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Column:

Study

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:

E0, E13, E2, E3, E62, H0, H2, H3, H6

Keywords:

Laffer curve, fiscal policy, labour tax rate, tax cut, human capital, self-financing

References:

Akgun, O. – Bartolini, D. – Cournède, B. (2017): The capacity of governments to raise taxes. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1407. https://doi.org/10.1787/6bee2df9-en

Baksay, G. – Palotai, D. (2017): Válságkezelés és gazdasági reformok Magyarországon, 2010–2016 (Recession management and economic reforms in Hungary, 2010–2016). Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review), 64(7–8): 698–722. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2017.7-8.698

Clotfelter, C.T. (1983): Tax Evasion and Tax Rates: An Analysis of Individual Returns. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(3): 363–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924181

European Commission (2019): Taxation trends in the European Union: 2019 edition. Taxation trends 2019. Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.

Feldstein, M. (1995): The Effect of Marginal Tax Rates on Taxable Income: A Panel Study of the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Journal of Political Economy, 103(3): 551–572. https://doi.org/10.1086/261994

Féve, P. – Matheron, J. – Sahuc, J.-G. (2018): The Horizontally S-Shaped Laffer Curve. Journal of the European Economic Association 16(3): 857–893. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx027

Floden, M. – Lindé, J. (2001): Idiosyncratic Risk in the United States and Sweden: Is There a Role for Government Insurance? Review of Economic Dynamics, 4(2): 406–437. https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.2000.0121

Heathcote, J. – Storesletten, K. – Violante, G. (2009): Redistributive Taxation in a Partial- Insurance Economy. Slides.

Ireland, P. (1994): Supply-side economics and endogenous growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 33(3): 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(94)90043-4

Jongen, E. – Stoel, M. (2019): The Elasticity of Taxable Labour Income in the Netherlands. IZA Discussion Papers 12090, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-019-09349-7

King, R. – Rebelo, S. (1999): Resuscitating Real Business Cycles. In: Taylor, J.B. – Woodford, M. (Eds.): Handbook of Macroeconomics, 1B: 927–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0048(99)10022-3

Kleven, H.J. – Schultz, E.A. (2014): Estimating Taxable Income Responses Using Danish Tax Reforms. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(4): 271–301. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.6.4.271

Köllő, J. (ed.) (2010): A kérdőíves felvételekben megfigyelt, de be nem jelentett munkából eredő torzítás (Bias from surveyed but undeclared work). In: Torzítanak-e a diplomások bérelőnyére vonatkozó adatok? (Are data on the wage advantage of graduates biased?) Kutatási beszámoló (Research Report) OFA K-2008/F-8341

Matolcsy, Gy. – Palotai, D. (2018): The Hungarian Model: Hungarian Crisis Management in View of the Mediterranean Way. Financial and Economic Review, 17(2): 5–42. http://doi.org/10.25201/FER.17.2.542

MNB (2018): Competitiveness Report. Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Budapest.

Novalez, A. – Ruiz, J. (2002): Dynamic Laffer Curves. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27(2): 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(01)00031-8

Nutahara, K. (2015): Laffer curves in Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 36(C): 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2015.02.002

Saez, E. – Slemrod, J. – Giertz, S.H. (2012): The Elasticity of Taxable Income with Respect to Marginal Tax Rates: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1): 3–50. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.1.3

Schmitt-Grohe, S. – Uribe, M. (1997): Balanced-Budget Rules, Distortionary Taxes, and Aggregate Instability. Journal of Political Economy, 105(5): 976–1000. https://doi.org/10.1086/262101

Trabandt, M. – Uhlig, H. (2011): The Laffer curve revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58(4): 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2011.07.003

Trabandt, M. – Uhlig, H. (2012): How do Laffer curves differ across countries? NBER Working Paper No. 17862. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17862

Wanninski, J. (1978): Taxes, revenues, and the Laffer curve. The Public Interest, 50: 3–16.