Author information:
Barnabás Timár: Corvinus University of Budapest, Undergraduate Student. E-mail: barnabas.timar@stud.uni-corvinus.hu
Abstract:
In my study, I investigate whether it is possible to prove the hypothesis that investing in responsible, sustainable companies can be financially more rewarding from the perspective of investors, i.e. can result in higher profit than investing in companies that ignore these aspects. My further assumption is that this profit can be increased if I apply different restrictions or relative scores. I tested my hypotheses empirically on data from the New York Stock Exchange, both on investment strategies (portfolio creation) and at stock level (regression). I performed the tests for the total market, in detailed industry breakdowns and groupings as well. I tested the examined indicators (ESG, ENV) in isolation and with a relative approach, over several time horizons. For most of the tests, I obtained non-significant results; for some industries a minor negative impact can be seen, and for the regressions I obtained coefficients that are significant, but of negligible economic significance. Temporal decomposition shows the increasing significance of ESG and ENV, but even for the later time series it is not considered significant. The results suggest that the aspects under investigation are not yet priced by the market, so my hypotheses were not confirmed. This could be due to the greenwashing phenomenon or the developed US market.
Cite as (APA):
Timár, B. (2021). How Does the Market Price Responsible and Sustainable Investments? . Financial and Economic Review, 20(2), 117–147. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.20.2.117147
Column:
Study
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:
G17, G32, G41
Keywords:
Fama–French, ESG, ENV, environmental protection, factor, sustainability, return, US, stock exchange
References:
Amihud, Y. (2002): Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1): 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(01)00024-6
Aouadi, A. – Marsat, S. (2018): Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4): 1027–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8
Auer, B.R. – Schuhmacher, F. (2016): Do socially (ir)responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 59(February): 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2015.07.002
Bakó, B. – Neszveda, G. – Dezső, L. (2018): When irrelevant alternatives do matter. The effect of focusing on loan decisions. Theory and Decision, 84(1): 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9641-9
Bakó, B. – Neszveda, G. (2020): The Achilles’ heel of Salience theory and a way to fix it. Economics Letters, 193, 109265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109265
Bank, D. (2018): Implicit és explicit, valamint belső és külső CSR egy kettős függésben lévő piacgazdaságban. Különös tekintettel a munkavállalókról való gondoskodásra (Implicit and explicit, internal and external CSR in a double dependent market economy. Especially regarding labor provisions). Doctoral dissertation, Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem. https://doi.org/10.14267/phd.2018009
Berlinger, E. – Walter, Gy. (1999): Faktormodellek az értékpapírpiacon (Factor models in the securities market). Bankszemle, 43(4): 34–43.
Bordalo, P. – Gennaioli, N. – Shleifer, A. (2013): Salience and consumer choice. Journal of Political Economy, 121(5): 803–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/673885
Bóta, G. (2014): A magyarországi befektetési alapok teljesítményét meghatározó tényezők vizsgálata (Determinants of the performance of investment funds managed in Hungary). Hitelintézeti Szemle, 13(2): 147–163. http://epa.oszk.hu/02700/02722/00071/pdf/EPA02722_hitelintezeti_szemle_2014_2_147-163.pdf
Buallay, A. (2019): Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1): 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149
Cao, J. – Titman, S. – Zhan, X. – Zhang, W.E. (2020): ESG Preference, Institutional Trading, and Stock Return Patterns. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28156
Carhart, M.M. (1997): On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1): 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
Csillag, B. – Neszveda, G. (2020): A gazdasági várakozások hatása a tőzsdei momentumstratégiára (The impact of economic expectations on the momentum trading strategy). Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review), 67(11): 1093–1111. http://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2020.11.1093
Deák, Zs. – Hajdu Istvánné (2011): Az élelmiszer-ipari vállalkozások környezeti teljesítménye és a pénzügyi eredmények (The environmental performance and financial results of food industry businesses). Gazdálkodás: Scientific Journal on Agricultural Economics, 55(7): 662–667. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.119945
Dorfleitner, G. – Halbritter, G. – Nguyen, M. (2015): Measuring the level and risk of corporate responsibility – An empirical comparison of different ESG rating approaches. Journal of Asset Management, 16(7): 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2015.31
Fain, M. – Naffa, H. (2019): Performance Measurement of Active Investment Strategies Using Pure Factor Portfolios. Financial and Economic Review, 18(2): 52–86. http://doi.org/10.33893/FER.18.2.5286
Fama, E.F. – French, K.R. (1992): The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2): 427–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x
Fama, E.F. – French, K.R. (1996): The CAPM is wanted, dead or alive. The Journal of Finance, 51(5): 1947–1958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05233.x
Fama, E.F. – French, K.R. (2018): Choosing factors. Journal of Financial Economics, 128(2): 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.012
Fama, E.F. – MacBeth, J.D. (1973): Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3): 607–636.
Fernandez, P. (2015): CAPM: an absurd model. Business Valuation Review, 34(1): 4–23. https://doi.org/10.5791/0882-2875-34.1.4
Gillan, S. – Hartzell, J. – Koch, A. – Starks, L.T. (2010): Firms’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) choices, performance and managerial motivation. Unpublished working paper, Texas Tech University and University of Texas at Austin. http://www.pitt.edu/~awkoch/ESG Nov 2010.pdf. Downloaded: 15 September 2020.
Gloßner, S. (2017): ESG Risks and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns. Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI-AFFI, Paris, December. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2980917
Golovics, J. (2015): Bounded rationality and altruism: behaviourism in economics. Financial and Economic Review, 14(2): 158–172. https://en-hitelintezetiszemle.mnb.hu/letoltes/6-golovics-en.pdf
Halbritter, G. – Dorfleitner, G. (2015): The wages of social responsibility – where are they? A critical review of ESG investing. Review of Financial Economics, 26(1): 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2015.03.004
Halldórsdóttir, T.R. (2020): Did firms with higher ESG ranking provide better stock performance during Covid-19? Doctoral dissertation, Reykjavik University. https://skemman.is/handle/1946/37170?locale=en
Henke, H.M. (2016): The effect of social screening on bond mutual fund performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 67(June): 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.01.010
Ince, O.S. – Porter, R.B. (2006): Individual equity return data from Thomson Datastream: Handle with care! Journal of Financial Research, 29(4): 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2006.00189.x
Jain, M. – Sharma, G.D. – Srivastava, M. (2019): Can Sustainable Investment Yield Better Financial Returns: A Comparative Study of ESG Indices and MSCI Indices. Risks, 7(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks7010015
Khan, M. (2019): Corporate Governance, ESG, and Stock Returns around the World. Financial Analysts Journal, 75(4): 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1654299
Kotsantonis, S. – Pinney, C. – Serafeim, G. (2016): ESG integration in investment management: Myths and realities. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2): 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12169
Kotsantonis, S. – Serafeim, G. (2019): Four Things No One Will Tell You About ESG Data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2): 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12346
Kőszegi, B. – Szeidl, A. (2013): A Model of Focusing in Economic Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1): 53–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs049
Kumar, A. – Smith, C. – Badis, L. – Wang, N. – Ambrosy, P. – Tavares, R. (2016): ESG factors and risk-adjusted performance: a new quantitative model. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 6(4): 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1234909
Kumar, R. (2019): ESG: Alpha or Duty? The Journal of Index Investing, 9(4): 58–66. https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2019.1.066
Kuzmina, J. – Lindemane, M. (2017): ESG Investing: New Challenges and New Opportunities. Journal of Business Management, 5(14): 85–98
Lai, T.Y. – Stohs, M.H. (2015): Yes, CAPM is dead. International Journal of Business, 20(2): 144–158.
Landi, G. – Sciarelli, M. (2019): Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1): 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0254
Li, F. – Polychronopoulos, A. (2020): What a difference an ESG ratings provider makes! Working Paper. https://www.researchaffiliates.com/en_us/publications/articles/what-a-difference-an-esg-ratings-provider-makes.html. Downloaded: 17 January 2021.
Maiti, M. (2020): Is ESG the succeeding risk factor? Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1723380
Mérő, B. – Nagy, O. – Neszveda, G. (2019): Új faktorok tesztelése az empirikus eszközárazásban (Testing new factors in empirical asset pricing). SZIGMA Matematikai-közgazdasági folyóirat (Journal of Mathematical Economics), 50(4): 263–281.
Németh-Durkó, E. (2019): Környezet és pénzügyek (Environment and Finance). Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, Working Paper. http://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/4294/1/NDE_kornyezet_es_penzugyek.pdf. Downloaded: 18 August 2020.
Neszveda, G. (2018): The Contribution of Thaler to Behavioural Economics. Financial and Economic Review, 17(1): 153–167. http://doi.org/10.25201/FER.17.1.153167
Newey, W.K. – West, K.D. (1987): Hypothesis Testing with Efficient Method of Moments Estimation. International Economic Review, 28(3): 777–787. https://doi.org/10.2307/2526578
Ransburg, B. – Vágási, M. (2011): A fenntartható fejlődés vállalati integrációja és kommunikációja – a hazai nagyvállalati gyakorlat vizsgálata (The Integration of Sustainable Development in the Light of Corporate Communication – The Case of Corporations in Hungary). Vezetéstudomány – Budapest Management Review, 42(10): 2–13. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2011.10.01
Ribando, J.M. – Bonne, G. (2010): A new quality factor: Finding alpha with ASSET4 ESG data. Starmine Research Note, Thomson Reuters, 31 March. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/content/dam/openweb/documents/pdf/tr-com-financial/report/starmine-quant-research-note-on-asset4-data.pdf
Sahut, J.M. – Pasquini-Descomps, H. (2015): ESG Impact on Market Performance of Firms: International Evidence. Management International/International Management/Gestiòn Internacional, 19(2): 40–63. https://doi.org/10.7202/1030386ar
Shumway, T. (1997): The Delisting Bias in CRSP data. The Journal of Finance, 52(1): 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03818.x
Talan, G. – Sharma, G.D. (2019): Doing Well by Doing Good: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda for Sustainable Investment. Sustainability, 11(2), 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020353
Torre, M.L. – Mango, F. – Cafaro, A. – Leo, S. (2020): Does the ESG Index Affect Stock Return? Evidence from the Eurostoxx50. Sustainability, 12(16), 6387. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166387
Townsend, B. (2020): From SRI to ESG: The Origins of Socially Responsible and Sustainable Investing. The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing, 1(1): 10–25. https://doi.org/10.3905/jesg.2020.1.1.010
US SIF Foundation (2018): Report on US Sustainable, Responsible and Impact Investing Trends 2018. US SIF Foundation study. https://www.ussif.org/files/Trends/Trends 2018 executive summary FINAL.pdf
Uyar, A. – Karaman, A.S. – Kilic, M. (2020): Is corporate social responsibility reporting a tool of signaling or greenwashing? Evidence from the worldwide logistics sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253(April), 119997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.119997
Van Duuren, E. – Plantinga, A. – Scholtens, B. (2016): ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3): 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2610-8
Verheyden, T. – Eccles, R.G. – Feiner, A. (2016): ESG for all? The impact of ESG screening on return, risk, and diversification. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2): 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12174
Wimmer, M. (2013): ESG-persistence in Socially Responsible Mutual Funds. Journal of Management. & Sustainability, 3(1): 9–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jms.v3n1p9
Yu, E.P.Y. – Van Luu, B. – Chen, C.H. (2020): Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance, 52(April): 101–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192