Author information:
Pablo GarcĂa Guzmán https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1111-9848: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Associate Economist. E-mail: GARCIAGP@ebrd.com
Zsóka Kóczán https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6653-6877: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Associate Director and Lead Economist. E-mail: KoczanZ@ebrd.com
Abstract:
While individuals in emerging markets are concerned about climate change, such concerns do not necessarily translate into a willingness to pay for environmental policies. Using rich data for 37 economies, mostly from emerging markets in Europe, the Caucasus, Central Asia and parts of North Africa and the Middle East, we empirically examine correlations with willingness to pay for environmental policies. We show that, beyond ability to pay, people who expect to be better off in the future, who are more patient and who trust the government are all more likely to be willing to pay for policies that mitigate climate change. Our results thus suggest that measures that increase people’s incomes, build trust in government, reduce corruption and increase the transparency and efficiency of government spending could help boost support for green policies. Policies may also receive greater support if they take the form of subsidies, where the costs in terms of higher taxes are less salient.
Cite as (APA):
Guzmán, P.G., & Kóczán, Z. (2025). Attitudes to the Green Transition and Willingness to Pay in Emerging Markets: Concerned but Not Paying. Financial and Economic Review, 24(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.24.1.5
Column:
Study
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:
Q01, Q54, Q56, Q58
Keywords:
climate change, willingness to pay, trust, discount rate
References:
Andre, P. – Boneva, T. – Chopra, F. – Falk, A. (2024): Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action. Nature Climate Change, 14: 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01925-3
Bartók, L. (2019): Climate Change and the Hungarian Fiscal and Monetary Policy. Civic Review, 15(Special Issue): 329–333, https://doi.org/10.24307/psz.2020.0219
Bergquist, M. – Nilsson, A. – Harring, N. – Jagers, S.C. (2022): Meta-Analyses of Fifteen Determinants of Public Opinion about Climate Change Taxes and Laws. Nature Climate Change, 12(3): 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01297-6
Boros, E. (2020): Risks of Climate Change and Credit Institution Stress Tests. Financial and Economic Review, 19(4): 107–131. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.19.4.107131
Bumann, S. (2021): What are the Determinants of Public Support for Climate Policies? A Review of the Empirical Literature. Review of Economics, 72(3): 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2021-0046
Carattini, S. – Carvalho, M. – Fankhauser, S. (2018): Overcoming Public Resistance to Carbon Taxes. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9: e531. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.531
Chaikumbung, M. (2023): The effects of institutions and cultures on people's willingness to pay for climate change policies: A meta-regression analysis. Energy Policy, 177, 113513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113513
Dabla-Norris, E. – Helbling, T. – Khalid, S. – Khan, H. – Magistretti, G. – Sollaci, A. – Srinivasan, K. (2023): Public Perceptions of Climate Mitigation Policies: Evidence from Cross-Country Surveys. IMF Staff Discussion Note No. 2023/002. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400229756.006
Dabla-Norris, E. – Khalid, S. – Khan, H. – Lima, F. – Sollaci, A. (2024): Global Perceptions of Climate Risk and Climate Policy: Evidence from Cross-Country Surveys. IMF working paper, forthcoming.
De Haas, R. (2024): How Finance and Firms Can Accelerate the Green Transition. Financial and Economic Review, 23(3): 5–17. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.23.3.5
De Lipsis, V. (2021): Is time preference different across incomes and countries? Economics Letters, 201, 109720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109720
Dechezleprêtre, A. – Fabre, A. – Kruse, T. – Planterose, B. – Chico, A.S. – Stantcheva, S. (2022): Fighting Climate Change: International Attitudes toward Climate Policies. NBER Working Paper No. 30265. https://doi.org/10.3386/w30265
Douenne, T. – Fabre, A. (2022): Yellow Vests, Pessimistic Beliefs, and Carbon Tax Aversion. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14(1): 81–110. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200092
Drews, S. – van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2016): What Explains Public Support for Climate Policies? A Review of Empirical and Experimental Studies. Climate Policy, 16(7): 855–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240
EBRD (2023): Transition Report 2023–24 – Transitions big and small. London. https://www.ebrd.com/publications/transition-report-202324
EBRD (2024): Household resilience in a turbulent world. Life in Transition Survey IV Report. London. https://www.ebrd.com/life-in-transition-survey-iv
Fairbrother, M. (2022): Public Opinion about Climate Policies: A Review and Call for More Studies of What People Want. PLOS Climate, 1(5): e0000030. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000030
Flammer, C. – Giroux, T. – Heal, G.M. (2025): Biodiversity finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 164, 103987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103987
Graham, H. – de Bell, S. – Hanley, N. – Jarvis, S. – White, P.C.L. (2019): Willingness to pay for policies to reduce future deaths from climate change: evidence from a British survey. Public Health, 174: 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.06.001
IMF (2019): Fiscal Monitor: How to Mitigate Climate Change. October, Washington, DC. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2019/09/12/fiscal-monitor-october-2019
IMF (2022): A Greener Labor Market: Employment, Policies and Economic Transformation. Online annex to Chapter 3, World Economic Outlook, April, Washington, DC. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/supplemental/book/9781616359423/CH003.xml/ch3annex.pdf
Jonäll, K. – Arvidsson, S. – Baeckström, Y. – Elliot, V. (2025): The biodiversity–finance nexus: a future research agenda. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 72, 101504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2024.101504
Klenert, D. – Mattauch, L. – Combet, E. – Edenhofer, O. – Hepburn, C. – Rafaty, R. – Stern, N. (2018): Making Carbon Pricing Work for Citizens. Nature Climate Change, 8(8): 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0201-2
Kolozsi, P.P. – Ladányi, S. – Straubinger, A. (2022): Measuring the Climate Risk Exposure of Financial Assets – Methodological Challenges and Central Bank Practices. Financial and Economic Review, 21(1): 113–140. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.21.1.113
Kotchen, M.J. – Boyle, K.J. – Leiserowitz, A.A. (2013): Willingness-to-pay and policy-instrument choice for climate-change policy in the United States. Energy Policy, 55: 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.058
Leiserowitz, A. – Carman, J. – Buttermore, N. – Wang, X. – Rosenthal, S. – Marlon, J. – Mulcahy, K. (2021): International Public Opinion on Climate Change. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and Facebook Data for Good. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/international-public-opinion-on-climate-change/
Matolcsy, G. (2022): The Appearance of Economic, Social, Financial and Environmental Sustainability Aspects in the Practices of the National Bank of Hungary. Public Finance Quarterly, 67(3): 315–334. https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2022_3_1
Naffa, H. – Czupy, G.J. (2024): Biodiversity Risk Premium. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4751958
Németh-Durkó, E. – Hegedűs, A. (2021): Climate Change in the Capital Markets: A Study of Actively Managed Green Bond Funds. Financial and Economic Review, 20(4): 38–64. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.20.4.3864
OECD (2023): Job Creation and Local Economic Development 2023: Bridging the Great Green Divide. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/21db61c1-en (last accessed on 24 April 2024)
Pandurics, A. – Szalai, P. (2017): The Impact of Climate Change on the Insurance Sector. Financial and Economic Review, 16(1): 92–118. https://hitelintezetiszemle.mnb.hu/en/anett-pandurics-peter-szalai
Ritter, R. (2022): Banking Sector Exposures to Climate Risks – Overview of Transition Risks in the Hungarian Corporate Loan Portfolio. Financial and Economic Review, 21(1): 32–55. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.21.1.32
Sergi, B. – Davis, A. – Azevedo, I. (2018): The effect of providing climate and health information on support for alternative electricity portfolios. Environmental Research Letters, 13, 024026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9fab
Shang, B. (2021): The Poverty and Distributional Impacts of Carbon Pricing: Channels and Policy Implications. IMF Working Paper No. 2021/172. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2021/06/25/The-Poverty-and-Distributional-Impacts-of-Carbon-Pricing-Channels-and-Policy-Implications-50222
Szendrey, O. – Dombi, M. (2023): Measuring Climate Risks with Indirect Emissions. Financial and Economic Review, 22(1): 57–76. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.22.1.57
Várgedő, B. (2023): Climate Stress Test: The Impact of Carbon Price Shock on the Probability of Default in the Hungarian Banking System. Financial and Economic Review, 21(4): 57–82. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.21.4.57
Veronesi, M. – Chawla, F. – Maurer, M. – Lienert, J. (2014): Climate change and the willingness to pay to reduce ecological and health risks from wastewater flooding in urban centers and the environment. Ecological Economics, 98: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.005
Yesuf, M. – Bluffstone, R. (2019): Consumption Discount Rates, Risk Aversion and Wealth in Low-Income Countries: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural Ethiopia. Journal of African Economies, 28(1): 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejy010
Ziegler, A. (2017): Political Orientation, Environmental Values, and Climate Change Beliefs and Attitudes: An Empirical Cross-Country Analysis. Energy Economics, 63: 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.022