How Banks’ Tasks Regarding Their Financed Carbon Footprint is Misunderstood by EU Regulation

31 March 2026DOI: https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.25.1.151

Author information:

Gábor Szigel https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1809-5329: OTP Bank Nyrt., Senior Internal Advisor. E-mail:

Abstract:

Regulation in the EU makes banks responsible for the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of their borrowers and thus tries to use them as leverage to nudge polluting industries into the carbon-free transition. For lack of better alternatives, this occurs based on metrics that are neither reliable nor robust. While welcomed by the industry, the European Commission’s recent omnibus packages aimed at simplifying sustainability legislation will also probably not change that situation materially. Although it is perhaps well-intended, this approach assigns banks a task which they are not qualified for. It is unsurprising that the entire initiative has resulted in bureaucratic formalities in banks’ reports rather than substantive progress. It is not the best way to get credit institutions engaged in the green transition. Instead, banks should focus on what they are best at: lending, and more specifically, on lending for projects that advance the carbon-neutral transformation of the economy.

Cite as (APA):

Szigel, G. (2026). How Banks’ Tasks Regarding Their Financed Carbon Footprint is Misunderstood by EU Regulation. Financial and Economic Review, 25(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.25.1.151

PDF download
The works on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Column:

Essay

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:

G21, O13, P18, Q50

Keywords:

financed carbon footprint, financed greenhouse gas emission, green transition

References:

Angelico, C. – Bernardini, E. (2025): Can we trust banks’ emissions data? EFFAS paper, April 2025. https://effas.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Can-we-Trust-Banks-Emission-Data_2nd-Place-1.pdf. Downloaded: 6 January 2026.

Bethlendi, A. – Holczinger, N. (2024): Preferential Capital Requirements for Green Lending. First Experiences. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4783463

Castren, O. – Russo, R. (2024): Green-Supporting Factors, Brown-Penalising Factors and the Prudential Framework. European Banking Authority Research Paper No. 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4940266

Deák, V. – Sárvári, B. (2023): A jegybanki zöld mandátum elméleti és gyakorlati aspektusai (Theoretical and practical aspects of the central bank's green mandate). Polgári Szemle, 19(4–6): 48–61. https://doi.org/10.24307/psz.2023.1205

ECB (2023): “Running up that hill” – how climate-related and environmental risks turned mainstream in banking supervision and next steps for banks’ risk management practices. Welcome address by Frank Elderson, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB and Vice-Chair of the Supervisory Board of the ECB, ECB Industry Outreach event on Climate-related and Environmental Risk, Frankfurt am Main, 3 February 2023. https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/press/speeches/date/2023/html/ssm.sp230203~f126eef445.en.html. Downloaded: 1 January 2026.

Galeone, G. – Gianfrancesco, I. – Ranaldo, S. – Shini, M. (2025): Exploring the relationship between ESG score and systematic risk in the European stock market. Journal of Management and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-025-09761-z

Guzmán, P.G. – Kóczán, Z. (2025): Attitudes to the Green Transition and Willingness to Pay in Emerging Markets: Concerned but Not Paying. Financial and Economic Review, 24(1): 5–28. http://doi.org/10.33893/FER.24.1.5

IEA (2024): World Energy Outlook 2024. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024#downloads. Downloaded: 4 December 2025.

Kiss, B. – Homolya, D. – Walter, G. (2025): The Relationship between ESG Factors and Corporate Credit Risk: Research Trends from a Bibliometric Perspective. Financial and Economic Review, 24(4): 96–117. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.24.4.96

McGahan, A.M. (2004): How industries change. Harvard Business Review, 82(10): 86–94, 156, November 2004. https://hbr.org/2004/10/how-industries-change. Downloaded: 27 December 2025.

McKinsey (2023): An affordable, reliable, competitive path to net zero. McKinsey & Company, November 2023. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/an-affordable-reliable-competitive-path-to-net-zero#/. Downloaded: 27 December 2025.

PCAF (2022): The Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard Part A: Financed Emissions. Second Edition. https://carbonaccountingfinancials.com/en/standard#part-a-financed-emissions. Downloaded: 1 January 2026.

Várgedő, B. (2022): Climate Stress Test: The Impact of Carbon Price Shock on the Probability of Default in the Hungarian Banking System. Financial and Economic Review, 21(4): 57–82. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.21.4.57