Examination of the Sustainability Disclosure Practices at Banks Operating in Hungary

31 March 2026DOI: https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.25.1.53

Author information:

Regina Bodó https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7440-6094: University of Szeged, Assistant Lecturer. E-mail:

Edit Lippai-Makra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0315-5871: University of Szeged, Senior Lecturer. E-mail:

Abstract:

The EU’s directive on corporate sustainability reporting, which entered into force in 2022, brought changes to corporate disclosure practices. This study presents the potential effects of the new regulation on banks’ disclosures. In the course of the research, the disclosure practices of obliged banks operating in Hungary were examined using content analysis. The results indicate that, as a consequence of the regulation, overall disclosure intensity decreased; however, this decline is driven more by formal than substantive changes. Reports place greater emphasis on descriptive content, while numerical and graphical disclosures have receded into the background. It can also be established that the sustainability reports of the examined banks have become more similar both in content and in form, confirming the unifying objective of the regulation.

Cite as (APA):

Bodó, R., & Lippai-Makra, E. (2026). Examination of the Sustainability Disclosure Practices at Banks Operating in Hungary. Financial and Economic Review, 25(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.25.1.53

PDF download
The works on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Column:

Study

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:

G21, K32, M48, Q56

Keywords:

bank, sustainability, CSRD, NFRD, content analysis

References:

An, Y. – Davey, H. – Eggleton, I.R.C. (2011): Towards a comprehensive theoretical framework for voluntary IC disclosure. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(4): 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931111181733

Barakat, F.S.Q. – López Pérez, M.V. – Rodríguez Ariza, L. (2015): Corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) determinants of listed companies in Palestine (PXE) and Jordan (ASE). Review of Managerial Science, 9(4): 681–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0133-9

Baranyai, E. – Banai, Á. (2022): Feeling the Heat: Mortgage Lending and Central Bank Options. Financial and Economic Review, 21(1): 5–31. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.21.1.5

Barberis, N. – Thaler, R. (2003): Chapter 18 A survey of behavioral finance. In: Constantinides, G.M. – Harris, M. – Stulz, R.M. (eds.): Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Vol. 1, Part B, pp. 1053–1128. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0102(03)01027-6

Baumüller, J. – Grbenic, S.O. (2021): Moving from non-financial to sustainability reporting: analyzing the EU Commission’s proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Facta Universitatis, Series: Economics and Organization, 18(4) (Special issue): 369–381. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUEO210817026B

Brundtland, G.H. (1987): Our Common Future—Call for Action. Environmental Conservation, 14(4): 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900016805

Connelly, B.L. – Certo, S.T. – Ireland, R.D. – Reutzel, C.R. (2011): Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1): 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419

Deák, V. – Sárvári, B. (2023): A jegybanki zöld mandátum elméleti és gyakorlati aspektusai (Theoretical and practical aspects of the central bank's green mandate). Polgári Szemle, 19(4–6): 48–61. https://doi.org/10.24307/psz.2023.1205

Deegan, C. (2014): An overview of legitimacy theory as applied within the social and environmental accounting literature. In: Unerman, J. – Bebbington, J. - O'Dwyer, B. (eds.): Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (2nd ed.). Routledge, Chapter 15.

Dissanayake, D. (2020): Sustainability key performance indicators and the global reporting initiative: Usage and challenges in a developing country context. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3): 543–567. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2019-0543

Dumitru, M. – Dyduch, J. – Gușe, R.G. – Krasodomska, J. (2017): Corporate Reporting Practices in Poland and Romania – An Ex-ante Study to the New Non-financial Reporting European Directive. Accounting in Europe, 14(3): 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2017.1378427

Esty, D.C. – Cort, T. (2020): Sustainable Investing at a Turning Point. In: Esty, D.C. – Cort, T. (eds.): Values at Work: Sustainable Investing and ESG Reporting. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55613-6_1

Esty, D.C. – Lubin, D.A. (2020): Toward a Next Generation of Corporate Sustainability Metrics. In: Esty, D.C. – Cort, T. (eds.): Values at Work: Sustainable Investing and ESG Reporting. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55613-6_7

Faqih, A. – Kramer, R. (2024): The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD): An Effective Approach to Implementation. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 13(4). https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article/view/47753

Freeman, R.E. (2010): Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675

Friedman, M. (1970): A Friedman doctrine – The Social Responsibility Of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times, 13 September, p. 17. https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html

Gyulavári, T. – Mitev, A.Z. – Neulinger, Á. – Neumann-Bódi, E. – Simon, J. – Szűcs, K. (2017): A marketingkutatás alapjai (Fundamentals of Marketing Research). Akadémiai Kiadó. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789630598880

Gyura, G. – Holczinger, N. – Kim, D. (2023): Zöld pénzügyek a felügyelet tevékenységében (Green Finance in Supervisory Activities). In: Kandrács, Cs. (ed.): Stabilitás és bizalom: A magyar pénzügyi felügyelés története (Stability and Trust: The History of Hungarian Financial Supervision). Magyar Nemzeti Bank, pp. 836–856.

Hill, J. (2020): Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Investing: A Balanced Analysis of the Theory and Practice of a Sustainable Portfolio. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-03866-9

Holczinger, N. – Sárvári, B. (2025): A zöld átmenet szerepe a Visegrádi országokban a KAYA-azonosság alapján (The role of the green transition in the Visegrad countries based on the KAYA identity). Észak-magyarországi Stratégiai Füzetek, 22(01): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.32976/stratfuz.2025.1

Jensen, M.C. – Meckling, W.H. (1976): Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kandrács, Cs. – Ritter, R. – Sárvári, B. (2021): Greening the Financial System – A New Opportunity for Eurasian Cooperation?. In: Patai, M. – Horváth, M. (eds.): Age of Eurasia – Future directions of knowledge, technology, money and sustainable geoeconomics. Magyar Nemzeti Bank, pp. 311–336. https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/eura-zsia-tanulma-nyko-tet-eng-webre-2.pdf

Kirschenmann, K. (2022): The EU Taxonomy’s (Potential) Effects on the Banking Sector and Bank Lending to Firms. The Economists’ Voice, 19(2): 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2022-0027

Krippendorff, K. (2004): Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd edition). Sage.

Lakatos, L.P. (2013): A számviteli érdekhordozói elméletek evolúciója és a szabályozás – klasszikus tézisek és új irányok a pénzügyi beszámolásban (Evolution of the financial accounting stakeholder theories and the regulation – classic theses and new ways in the financial report). Vezetéstudomány – Budapest Management Review, 44(5): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2013.05.05

Li, J. – Pike, R. – Haniffa, R. (2008): Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms. Accounting and Business Research, 38(2): 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2008.9663326

Lippai-Makra, E. (2025): Fókuszban a nem pénzügyi közzététel – Az NFRD hatása a magyar közérdeklődésre számot tartó gazdálkodók közzétételi gyakorlatára (Focus on Non-Financial Disclosure – The Impact of the NFRD on the Disclosure Practices of Hungarian Public Interest Entities). SALDO. https://doi.org/10.62133/SALDO.FKNF8965

Lippai-Makra, E. – Kovács, Z.I. (2021): Motivációk a nem pénzügyi információk közzététele mögött – interjús kutatás a közérdeklődésre számot tartó szervezetek kommunikációjáról. Marketing & Menedzsment, 55(1): 55–65. https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2021.55.01.05

Lippai-Makra, E. – Kovács, Z.I. – Bodó, R. (2024): A magyar vállalatok fenntarthatósági közzétételének vizsgálata tartalomelemzéssel, a változó szabályozás tükrében (Content analysis of Hungarian companies’ sustainability reporting practices in the light of changing regulations). Vezetéstudomány – Budapest Management Review, 55(Különszám): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2024.KSZ.01

Mahajan, R. – Lim, W.M. – Sareen, M. – Kumar, S. – Panwar, R. (2023): Stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Research, 166, 114104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114104

Manes-Rossi, F. – Tiron-Tudor, A. – Nicolò, G. – Zanellato, G. (2018): Ensuring More Sustainable Reporting in Europe Using Non-Financial Disclosure – De Facto and De Jure Evidence. Sustainability, 10(4), 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041162

Omran, M.A. – Ramdhony, D. (2015): Theoretical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Critical Review. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 5(2): 38–55. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v5i2.8035

Ortas, E. – Gallego‐Alvarez, I. – Álvarez Etxeberria, I. (2015): Financial Factors Influencing the Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management Disclosure: A Quantile Regression Approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6): 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1351

Papp, D. – Sárvári, B. – Varga, M. (2022): Fenntartható pénzügyek – A pénzügyi rendszer és a fenntarthatóság kapcsolata (Sustainable Finance – The Relationship between the Financial System and Sustainability). In: Baksay, G. – Matolcsy, Gy. – Virág, B. (eds.): Új fenntartható közgazdaságtan. Globális vitairat (New Sustainable Economics. Global Discussion Paper). Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Budapest.

Pizzi, S. – Del Baldo, M. – Caputo, F. – Venturelli, A. (2022): Voluntary disclosure of Sustainable Development Goals in mandatory non-financial reports: The moderating role of cultural dimension. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 33(1): 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12139

Pizzi, S. – Principale, S. – Fasiello, R. – Imperiale, F. (2023): The institutionalisation of social and environmental accounting practices in Europe. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(5): 816–838. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-07-2022-0190

Posadas, S.C. – Ruiz-Blanco, S. – Fernandez-Feijoo, B. – Tarquinio, L. (2023): Institutional isomorphism under the test of Non-financial Reporting Directive. Evidence from Italy and Spain. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(7): 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2022-1606

Remlein, M. – Romić, A.R. (eds.) (2025): Corporate Sustainability Reporting in Central and Eastern European Companies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003451884

Sherwood, M.W. – Pollard, J. (2018): Responsible Investing: An Introduction to Environmental, Social, and Governance Investments. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203712078

Soppe, A. (2004): Sustainable Corporate Finance. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1): 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039410.18373.12

Soyombo, O.T. – Odunaiya, O.G. – Okoli, C.E. – Usiagu, G.S. – Ekemezie, I.O. (2024): Sustainability reporting in corporations: A comparative review of practices in the USA and Europe. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 18(2): 204–214. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.061

Stamelos, C. (2022): Corporate sustainability and ESG factors in Greece and Cyprus: Compliance, laws and business practices, towards a holistic approach. InterEULawEast : Journal for the International and European Law, Economics and Market Integrations, 9(2): 289–313. https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2022.9.2.10

Stefanescu, C.A. (2022): Linking sustainability and non-financial reporting directive 2014/95/EU through isomorphism lens. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(6): 1680–1704. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2020-1019

Surman, V. – Böcskei, E. (2023): Fenntarthatóság a magyar kis- és középvállalati szektorban (Sustainability in the Hungarian small and medium-sized enterprise sector). Vezetéstudomány – Budapest Management Review, 54(10): 15–28. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2023.10.02

Tóth, B. – Lippai-Makra, E. (2024): Institutional Isomorphism in Accounting Innovations. Economy and Finance, 11(3): 301–323. https://doi.org/10.33908/EF.2024.3.4

Várgedő, B. (2022): Climate Stress Test: The Impact of Carbon Price Shock on the Probability of Default in the Hungarian Banking System. Financial and Economic Review, 21(4): 57–82. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.21.4.57

Warshauer, E. – Krosinsky, C. (2020): Financing the Transition to Green Infrastructure. In: Esty, D.C. – Cort, T. (eds.): Values at Work: Sustainable Investing and ESG Reporting. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55613-6_8

Zülch, H. – Ottenstein, P. – Schneider, A. (2021): The New Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) Proposal: Are German Firms Already Compliant?. KoR: internationale und kapitalmarktorientierte Rechnungslegung, 21(7–8): 345–348.