Comparison of Capital Adequacy Rules for Credit Institutions and Investment Firms

31 March 2026DOI: https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.25.1.79

Author information:

László Seregdi https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5841-945X: Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Head of Department. E-mail:

Nikolett Kovácsné Bóta https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0644-980X: Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Senior Regulatory Expert. E-mail:

Abstract:

Capital adequacy requirements play a key role in the current prudential regulatory system for the financial sector, both for credit institutions and investment firms. This study summarises how the system of requirements has developed, which elements are similar for credit institutions and investment firms, what the differences are, and what justifies them. It is also examined whether the capital requirement regulatory system for investment firms has become more effective, as a result of the special framework based specifically on the particular risks of investment firms that was developed for them starting in 2021. Finally, the paper also discusses possible directions in which capital requirements regulation may further evolve in these sectors.

Cite as (APA):

Seregdi, L., & Kovácsné Bóta, N. (2026). Comparison of Capital Adequacy Rules for Credit Institutions and Investment Firms. Financial and Economic Review, 25(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.25.1.79

PDF download
The works on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Column:

Study

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:

F38, G21, G24, G28, N24

Keywords:

capital adequacy, credit institutions, investment firms, prudential regulation

References:

Dakó, G. – Farkas, Y. – Forrai, M. – Gellén, K. – Pettkó-Szandtner, J. – Seregdi, L. et al. (2022): Nagykommentár a befektetési vállalkozásokról és az árutőzsdei szolgáltatókról, valamint az általuk végezhető tevékenységek szabályairól szóló 2007. évi CXXXVIII. törvényhez (Commentary on Act CXXXVIII of 2007 on investment firms and commodity exchange service providers and the rules on the activities they may carry out). Bszt-kommentár.

Capone, V. – Arcuti, S. – Ardini, D. – Fagiolari, L. – Maggiori, P. – Zambuto, F. (2024): CRR II and IFR: Are changes noticeable for Italian banks and investment firms? Some evidence from supervisory reporting data. Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 854, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area. https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdi/opques/qef_854_24.html

EBA (2015): Report on Investment Firms – Response to the Commission’s Call for Advice of December 2014. (EBA/Op/2015/20), 14 December 2015. https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/10180/983359/0bd8f11e-4a5e-4e33-ad13-d9dbe23ea1af/EBA-Op-2015-20 Report on investment firms.pdf

EBA (2023): Report on the role of environmental and social risks in the prudential framework. (EBA/REP/2023/34), 12 October 2023. https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document_library/Publications/Reports/2023/1062711/Report on the role of environmental and social risks in the prudential framework.pdf

EBA (2024a): 2024 Supervisory Disclosure Exercise Under IFD-R. https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-11/be45f19c-4368-4b2b-a224-4091133f89d2/supervisory_disclosure_ifd_-_annex_4_-_aggregate_statistical_data_parts_12_rev2.pdf

EBA (2024b): Discussion on the potential review of the investment firms’ prudential framework. (EBA/DP/2024/01), 3 September 2024. https://www.eba.europa.eu/publications-and-media/events/discussion-potential-review-investment-firms-prudential-framework

EBA (2025): Technical Advice of the EBA and ESMA in response to the Commission call for advice on the investment firms prudential framework. (EBA/Rep/2025/29, ESMA35-24871704-2858), 15 October 2025. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2025-10/ESMA35-24871704-2858_Final_report_on_the_Call_for_Advice_on_the_investment_firms_prudential_framework.pdf

Füstös, H. (2017): Changes of Basel regulatory framework and CRD and their impact on Capital adequacy ratio and Guaranty capital of banks in Hungary. Journal of Economy & Society, 8(2): 92–104. https://doi.org/10.21637/GT.2016.2.05.

Kandrács, C. – Fenyvesi, R. – Seregdi, L. – Varga, B. – Szegfű, L.P. (2018): Bankszabályozás és bankfelügyelés (Banking regulation and supervision). In: Fábián, G. – Virág, B. (eds.): Bankok a történelemben: innovációk és válságok (Banks in history: innovations and crises). Magyar Nemzeti Bank, Budapest, pp. 742–830.

MNB (2025a): Report on Insurance, Funds, Capital Market Risks and Consumer Protection, 2025. Magyar Nemzeti Bank. https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/mnb-report-on-insurance-funds-2025.pdf

MNB (2025b): Methodological notes for the trading data of investment providers and for time series containing prudential data of investment companies. Magyar Nemzeti Bank. https://statisztika.mnb.hu/sw/static/file/Trading_data_of_inv_prov_and_prudential_data_of_if_eng.pdf

Radnai, M. – Vonnák, D. (2010): Banki tőkemegfelelési kézikönyv (Bank Capital Adequacy Manual). Alinea Kiadó, Budapest.

Tajti, Z. (2011): A bázeli ajánlások és a tőkemegfelelési direktíva (CRD) formálódása (The formation of the Basel Recommendations and the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD)). Hitelintézeti Szemle, 10(5): 499–519.