Author information:
Áron Horváth: ELTINGA Centre for Real Estate Research, Head; Centre for Economic and Regional Studies – Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Research Fellow. E-mail: horvathar@eltinga.hu
Blanka Imre: Università Bocconi, PhD student. E-mail: blanka.imre@unibocconi.it
Zoltán Sápi: ELTINGA Centre for Real Estate Research, Analyst. E-mail: sapiz@eltinga.hu
Abstract:
In the wake of regulatory, information technology and methodological changes, statistical property valuation has gained traction in Hungary. This paper looks at the available methods of appraisal based on the literature. We provide an overview of the advantages and drawbacks of the currently known methods. Based on these, automated valuation models
Cite as (APA):
Horváth, Á., Imre, B., & Sápi, Z. (2016). The International Practice of Statistical Property Valuation Methods and the Possibilities of Introducing Automated Valuation Models in Hungary. Financial and Economic Review, 15(4), 45–64. https://hitelintezetiszemle.mnb.hu/en/aron-horvath-blanka-imre-zoltan-sapi
Column:
Study
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes:
C15, C45, G21
Keywords:
mortgage, collateral valuation, automated valuation model, statistical valuation
References:
Anselin, L. (1988): Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 284 p.
Anselin, L. (1990): Spatial dependence and spatial structural instability in applied regression analysis. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 30, May, pp. 185–207.
Anselin, L. (2009): Spatial Regression. In: A.S. Fotheringham – P.A. Rogerson (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Spatial Analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd., London, pp. 255–276.
Anselin, L. (2010): Thirty years of spatial econometrics. Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 89, March, pp. 3–25.
Békés, G. – Horváth, Á. – Sápi, Z. (2016): Housing prices and municipality-based differences (Lakóingatlan-árak és települési különbségek). MT-DP – 2016/21, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, p. 39
Bourassa, S.C. – Hoesli, M. – Peng, V.S. (2003): Do housing submarkets really matter? Journal of Housing Economics, Vol. 12, March, pp. 12–28.
Cassetti, E. (1997): The expansion method, mathematical modeling, and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review, Vol. 20, April, pp. 9–33.
Clapp, J.M. – O’Connor, P.M. (2008): Best practice automated valuation models of time and space. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253052334_Best_Practice_Automated_Valuation_Models_of_Time_and_Space. Downloaded: 2 October 2016
Coulson, E. (2008): Hedonic methods and housing markets. Unpublished manuscript, Penn State University, Pennsylvania.
d’Amato, M. – Siniak, N. (2008): Using Fuzzy Numbers in Mass Appraisal: The Case of the Belarusian Property Market. In: T. Kauko – M. d’Amato (Eds.): Mass Appraisal Methods: An International Perspective for Property Valuers, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 91–107.
Davidson, R. – MacKinnon, J.G. (1981): Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica, Vol.49., May, pp. 781–793.
Elhorst, J.P. (2010): Applied spatial econometrics: Raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis, Vol. 5, March, pp. 9–28.
EMF – EAA (2016): Joint Paper on the use of automated valuation models in Europe. http://hb.betterregulation.com/external/EMF_EAA Joint Paper on Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) in Europe 09 May 16.pdf. Downloaded: 2 October 2016
Fotheringham, A.S. – Rogerson, P.A. (2009): The SAGE Handbook of Spatial Analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd., London, 511 p.
Fotheringham, A.S. – Brunsdon, C. – Charlton, M. (2002): Geographically Weighted Regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, 269 p.
Gelfand, A. – Kim, H.-J. – Sirmans, C.F – Banerjee, S. (2003): Spatial modeling with spatially varying coefficient processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 98, June, pp. 387–396.
Gibbons, S. – Machin, S. (2003): Valuing English primary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 53, March, pp. 197–219.
González, M.A.S. (2008): Developing Mass Appraisal Models with Fuzzy Systems. In: T. Kauko – M. d’Amato (Eds.): Mass Appraisal Methods: An International Perspective for Property Valuers, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 183–202.
Goodman, A. – Thibodeau, T. (2003): Housing market segmentation and hedonic prediction accuracy. Journal of Housing Economics, Vol. 12., September, pp. 181–201.
Gress, B. (2004): Semi-Parametric Spatial Autocovariance Models. PhD thesis. CA: University of California, Riverside.
Henderson, D.J. – Ullah, A. (2005): A nonparametric random effects estimator. Economic Letters, Vol.88., September, pp. 403–407.
Kain, J.F. – Quigley, J.M. (1970): Measuring the value of housing quality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 65, June, pp. 532–548.
Kauko, T. – d’Amato, M. (2008a): Mass Appraisal Methods: An International Perspective for Property Valuers, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 324 p.
Kauko, T. – d’Amato, M. (2008b): Introduction: Suitability Issues in Mass Appraisal Methodology. In: T. Kauko – M. d’Amato (Eds.): Mass Appraisal Methods: An International Perspective for Property Valuers, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 1–24.
Lee, Y.-L. – Jung, C. – Kuang, Y.Y. (2003): Fair Evaluation of real Estate Value in Urban Area via Fuzzy Theory. 10th ERES Conference, Helsinki, Finland, 10-13. June
LeSage, J. – Pace, R.K. (2009): Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 374 p.
Lughofer, E. – Trawiński, B. – Trawiński, K. – Kempa, O. – Lasota, T. (2011): On employing fuzzy modeling algorithms for the valuation of residential premises. Information Sciences, Vol.181., December, pp. 5123–5142.
MacQueen, J. (1967): Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: L.M. Le Cam – J. Neyman (Eds.): Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Volume I: Theory of Statistics, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 281–297.
Manski, C.F. (1993): Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 60, July, pp. 531–542.
Mimis, A. – Rovolis, A. – Stamou, M. (2013): Property valuation with artificial neural network: The case of Athens. Journal of Property Research, Vol. 30, June, pp. 128–143.
Nourse, H. (1963): The effect of public housing on property values in St Louis. Land Economics, Vol. 39, November, pp. 433-441.
Pagourtzi, E. – Assimakopoulos, V. – Hatzichristos, T. – French, N. (2003): Real estate appraisal: A review of valuation methods. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 21 (4), pp. 383–401.
Peterson, S. – Flanagan, A. (2009): Neural network hedonic pricing models in mass real estate appraisal. Journal of Real Estate Research, 31(2), pp. 147–164.
Pinkse, J. – Slade, M.E. – Brett, C. (2002): Spatial price competition: A semiparametric approach. Econometrica, Vol. 70, May, pp. 1111–1153.
Ridker, R.G. – Henning, J.A. (1967): The determinants of residential property values with special reference to air pollution. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 49, May, pp.246– 257.
Rosen, S. (1974): Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economics, Vol.82., January-February, pp. 34–55.
Rossini, P. – Kershaw, P. (2005): Using a hybrid automated valuation model to estimate capital and site values. Eleventh Annual Pacific-Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Melbourne Australia, January 23rd – 27th January, 2005.
Sui, D.Z. (1992): A Fuzzy GIS Modeling Approach for Urban Land Evaluation. Computer Environment and Urban Systems, 16(2), pp. 101–115.